Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Mar 7, 2025
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-912V

KAYLA BROWN,

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner,

v. Filed: February 5, 2025

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Mitchell Jones, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

On February 11, 2021, Kayla Brown filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). On September 29, 2020, Petitioner received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine,

which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

(“SIRVA”) as set forth in the Table. On June 11, 2024, I issued a decision awarding

compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 62.

1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of

2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In

accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other

information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I

agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award

of $41,363.46 (representing $40,362.70 in fees plus $1,000.76 in costs). Application for

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed August 15, 2024, ECF No. 67. Furthermore,

Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that Petitioner incurred $8.00 in personal

out-of-pocket expenses. ECF No. 67-3.

Respondent reacted to the motion on August 21, 2024, indicating that he is

satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in

this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Motion

at 2-4, ECF No. 68. Petitioner filed her reply on August 21, 2024, requesting fees and

costs be awarded without reduction. ECF No. 69.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all

claimed costs. ECF No. 67-2. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or

amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for

successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for

attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total

amount of $41,371.46 (representing $41,363.46 in attorney’s fees and costs, plus

$8.00 for Petitioner’s personal out-of-pocket expenses) to be paid through an ACH

deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the

absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),

the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice

renouncing their right to seek review.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.