Opinion

Opinion

Court
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Filed
Oct 2, 1996
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.2%

The opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON FILED

October 2, 1996

ADA BELL BROW a nd BEVERLY

N ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9605- 00174

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

J . EVERETT, MARI ON EVERETT ) Appellate C ourt Clerk

BARTON, a nd GERALD J OSEPH ) BLEDSOE LAW

EVERETT, )

) HON. BUDDY L. PERRY,

Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l e e s , ) J UDGE

)

v. )

)

RALPH EVERETT ( i ndi vi dua l l y )

a n d a s Exe c ut or of t he Es t a t e )

o f J o s e ph Robe r t Eve r e t t ) , )

HERBERT D. EVERETT, J AM ES R. )

EVERETT, DORI S D. HI GGI NS, )

KATI E T. TOM NSON a nd LAURA )

LI

SHAW , ) AFFI RMED

) AND

De f e nda nt s - Appe l l a n t s . ) REMANDED

DAVI D R. SW AFFORD, SW AFFORD & SWAFFORD, Pi ke vi l l e , f or

Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l e e s .

EDW N Z. KELLY, J R. , KELLY, KELLY & GOUGER, P. C. , J a s pe r , f o r

I

De f e n d a nt s - Appe l l a nt s , Ra l ph Eve r e t t , J a me s R. Eve r e t t , Dor i s

D. Hi g gi ns , Ka t i e G. Toml i ns on, a nd La ur a Sha w.

O P I N I O N

Fr a nks . J .

I n t hi s c ont e s t of t he wi l l of t he de c e a s e d, J os e p h

Ev e r e t t , a j ur y r e t ur ne d s pe c i a l ve r di c t s t ha t t he de c e a s e d

d i d n o t ha ve s uf f i c i e nt me nt a l c a pa c i t y t o ma ke a va l i d wi l l ,

a n d J os e ph Robe r t Eve r e t t , De c e a s e d, wa s undul y i nf l ue nc e d b y

Ra l p h Eve r e t t on M r c h 11 t o t he e xt e nt t ha t s uc h i nf l ue nc e

a

a mo u n t e d t o c oe r c i on, de s t r oyi ng t he f r e e wi l l of t he de c e a s e d

a n d s ubs t i t ut i ng hi s wi l l f or t he de c e a s e d a nd c ompe l l i ng t h e

d e c e a s e d t o ma ke a di s pos i t i on he ot he r wi s e woul d not ha ve

ma de .

The de f e nda nt s ha ve a ppe a l e d a nd r a i s e s e ve r a l

i s s ue s .

The de c e a s e d ha d e i ght c hi l dr e n. The ol de s t

c hi l d r e n we r e a ppe l l e e s Ada Be l l Br own a nd W l t e r Eve r e t t 1 .

a

Th e y f i l e d s ui t c ha l l e ng i ng de c e de nt ’ s M r c h 1991 wi l l , whi c h

a

l e f t t he m t e n dol l a r s e a c h a nd di vi de d t he r e ma i nde r of hi s

e s t a t e e qua l l y a mong hi s s i x younge r c hi l dr e n. The y a l l e ge d

t h a t d e c e de nt wa s of uns ound mi nd, i nc ompe t e nt t o ma ke a wi l l ,

a n d u n dul y i nf l ue nc e d by de f e nda nt Ra l ph Eve r e t t . Af t e r t he

j u r y v e r di c t t he pr oba t e of t he wi l l wa s a nnul l e d a nd va c a t e d .

W t hi n one mont h of t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l , t he

i

Ch a n c e r y Cour t of Bl e ds oe Count y, Te nne s s e e ha d f ound de c e d e n t

t o b e c ompe t e nt a nd di s mi s s e d a c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng.

Ap p e l l a nt s a r gue t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t s houl d ha ve gr a nt e d

t h e i r Pr e - Tr i a l M i on i n Li mi ne t ha t woul d ha ve pr e c l ude d t h e

ot

p l a i n t i f f s f r om a ny pr oof r e l a t i ve t o t he c ompe t e nc y of

d e c e d e nt pr i or t o t hi s he a r i ng. The y i ns i s t t ha t s uc h

e v i d e n c e c ons t i t ut e d a r e l i t i ga t i on of de c e de nt ’ s me nt a l

c a p a c i t y i n 1991 a nd i s ba r r e d by c ol l a t e r a l e s t oppe l .

Col l a t e r a l e s t oppe l ope r a t e s t o ba r a s e c ond s ui t

1

W l t e r Ev e r e t t d i e d i n 1 9 9 3 ; h i s c h i l d r e n M r i o n Ev e r e t t Ba r t o n a n d

a a

Ge r a l d J o s e p h Ev e r e t t we r e s u b s t i t u t e d a s p l a i n t i f f s i n p l a c e o f t h e i r

f a t he r .

2

b e t we e n t he s a me pa r t i e s a nd t he i r pr i vi e s on a di f f e r e nt

c a us e of a c t i on o nl y a s t o i s s ue s whi c h we r e a c t ua l l y

l i t i g a t e d a nd d e t e r mi ne d i n t he f or me r s ui t . Goe k e v . Wood s ,

7 7 7 S. W 2d 347 ( Te nn. 1989) .

.

The pa r t i e s t o t he 1991 t r i a l we r e Ra l ph Eve r e t t a s

Pe t i t i one r , de c e de nt J os e ph Eve r e t t a s r e s ponde nt , pl a i nt i f f

W l t e r Eve r e t t a s r e s pon de nt ’ s a t t or ne y i n f a c t , a nd t he Fi r s t

a

Na t i o n a l Ba nk. The j udge di s mi s s e d t he pe t i t i on s e e ki ng t he

a p p o i nt me nt of a c ons e r va t or a nd r e t ur ne d a l l a s s e t s he l d b y

W l t e r Eve r e t t t o d e c e de nt .

a

The pa r t i e s a nd i s s ue s we r e not i de nt i c a l . Howe ve r ,

b o t h he a r i ngs de a l t wi t h t he i s s ue of de c e de nt ’ s c ompe t e nc y

a n d i t c oul d be a r gue d t ha t Ada Be l l ’ s i nt e r e s t s we r e

r e p r e s e nt e d by he r br ot he r . Howe ve r , e ve n i f t he r e a r gua bl y

wa s a n y c ol l a t e r a l e s t oppe l f r om t hi s he a r i ng, t he Te nne s s e e

Su p r e me Cour t ha s he l d t ha t :

The e s t oppe l of a j udgme nt e xt e nds onl y t o t he f a c t s

i n i s s ue a s t he y e xi s t e d a t t he t i me t he j udgme nt

wa s r e nde r e d, a nd doe s not pr e ve nt a r e - e xa mi na t i o n

of t he s a me que s t i on be t we e n t he s a me pa r t i e s whe r e

i n t he i nt e r v a l t he f a c t s ha ve c ha nge d or ne w f a c t s

ha ve oc c ur r e d whi c h ma y a l t e r t he l e ga l r i ght s or

r e l a t i ons o f t he l i t i ga nt s .

W i t e v . W t e , 876 S. W 2d 837 ( Te nn. 1994) .

h hi .

He r e , t he de c e de nt ’ s de a t h f r om Al z he i me r ’ s wa r r a nt s

a r e - e va l ua t i on o f whe n t he di s e a s e ma y ha ve be gun a f f e c t i ng

h i s j u dgme nt . The Tr i a l Cour t di d not e r r i n a l l owi ng

t e s t i mony a nd pr oof a s t o hi s c ompe t e nc y a t t he t i me he

e x e c u t e d h i s wi l l .

A s e c ond c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng wa s he l d mor e

t ha n a y e a r a f t e r t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l . At t ha t t i me ,

d e c e de nt wa s d e c l a r e d u na bl e t o ha ndl e hi s a f f a i r s , a nd

3

d e f e n da nt Ra l ph Eve r e t t wa s a ppoi nt e d a s c ons e r va t or .

De f e n d a nt s a r gue t ha t t he s e c ond c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng i s

t o o r e mot e a nd not r e l e va nt t o t he de c e de nt ’ s s t a t e of mi nd

wh e n t he wi l l wa s dr a wn.

The c ompe t e nc y t o ma ke a wi l l i s me a s ur e d a t t he

t i me t he pe r s on e xe c ut e s t he wi l l a nd not by t he i r me nt a l

c o n d i t i on a n unr e a s ona bl e numbe r of ye a r s be f or e or a f t e r . In

r e Es t at e of M e s , 843 S. W 2d 418, 427 ( Te nn. App. 1992) .

ay .

Ev i d e n c e of t he t e s t a t or ’ s me nt a l c ondi t i on a f t e r ma ki ng t h e

wi l l i s a dmi s s i bl e , wi t hi n ?r e a s ona bl e l i mi t s ?, I d. , quot i ng

Pr i t c h a r d on W l l s a nd Admi ni s t r a t i on of Es t a t e s , §98 a t 14 1 .

i

He r e , i t wa s r e a s ona bl e t o a l l ow e vi de nc e of t he

c o n s e r va t or s hi p he a r i ng he l d wi t hi n 14 mont hs . M es.

ay Thi s

i s s u e i s r e l e va nt i n de t e r mi ni ng t he pr ogr e s s wi t h whi c h

Al z he i me r ’ s d i s e a s e ma y ha ve be c ome mor e de bi l i t a t i ng.

Te n n e s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 401 2 .

Ne xt , d e f e nda n t s i ns i s t t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d

i n a l l owi ng t he t e s t i mony of Dr . St ua r t Ba c on a nd J oa n De Bo r d .

Dr . Ba c on f i r s t s a w de c e de nt i n M r c h of 1992, j us t ove r a

a

y e a r a f t e r t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l . He t e s t i f i e d t ha t ,

b a s e d on a r e a s ona bl e de gr e e of me di c a l c e r t a i nt y, de c e de nt

d i e d o f Al z he i me r ’ s d i s e a s e . He t e s t i f i e d t ha t de c e de nt ha d

b e e n s uf f e r i ng f r om Al z he i me r ’ s f or a mi ni mum of t wo ye a r s

b e f o r e hi s Oc t obe r , 1992 de a t h.

De f e nda nt s a r gue t ha t t hi s e vi de nc e s houl d ha ve be e n

p r e c l u de d on t he gr ound t ha t i t ha d no r e l e va nc e t o t he

2

RULE 4 0 1 . DEF I NI TI ON OF ?RELEVANT EVI DENCE. ? ?Re l e v a n t e v i d e n c e ? me a n s

e v i d e n c e h a v i n g a n y t e n d e n c y t o ma k e t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n y f a c t t h a t i s

o f c o n s e q u e n c e t o t h e d e t e r mi n a t i o n o f t h e a c t i o n mo r e p r o b a b l e o r l e s s

p r o b a b l e t h a n i t wo u l d b e wi t h o u t t h e e v i d e n c e .

4

c o mp e t e nc y of de c e de nt i n M r c h of 1991.

a The y a l s o obj e c t e d

t o t h e e vi de nc e on t he ba s i s t ha t Dr . Ba c on’ s t e s t i mony

s t a t i n g t ha t de c e de nt wo ul d ha ve be e n e a s i l y i nf l ue nc e d whi l e

s u f f e r i ng f r om Al z he i me r ’ s wa s s pe c ul a t i on a nd c onj e c t ur e .

The e vi de nc e wa s r e l e va nt a nd a dmi s s i bl e . Te nne s s e e

Ru l e s of Evi de nc e , Rul e 401.

J oa n De Bor d i s a home he a l t h c a r e nur s e who be ga n

v i s i t i ng de c e de nt mor e t ha n one mont h a f t e r t he e xe c ut i on o f

h i s wi l l . She k e pt r e c or ds of t hos e vi s i t s a nd t e s t i f i e d f r o m

he r not e s . The s e not e s s how t ha t t he de c e a s e d wa s de pr e s s e d

a n d l one l y a nd c onc e r ne d ove r hi s c hi l dr e n t r yi ng t o pl a c e h i m

i n a n ur s i ng home a nd ha ve hi m de c l a r e d i nc ompe t e nt .

The Tr i a l Cour t r ul e d t ha t s he c oul d t e s t i f y f r om

h e r r e c or ds unde r t he bus i ne s s r e c or ds e xc e pt i on t o t he

3

h e a r s a y r ul e . M . De Bo r d’ s t e s t i mony me t t he e s s e nt i a l

s

e l e me nt s o f t hi s h e a r s a y e xc e pt i on. M di c a r e gui de l i ne s

e

r e q u i r e d t ha t s he ke e p r e c or ds of he r vi s i t s a nd s he pr e pa r e d

t he wr i t t e n r e por t s s hor t l y a f t e r he r vi s i t s . Cohe n,

S h e p p e ar d, Pai ne , Te nne s s e e La w of Evi de nc e , §803( 6) ( 1995) .

Th e Tr i a l Cour t di d not e r r i n a l l owi ng t hi s e vi de nc e .

The Tr i a l Cour t de ni e d de f e nda nt s ’ r e que s t t ha t t h e

3

Ru l e 8 0 3 ( 6 ) RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTI VI TY.

A me mo r a n d u m, r e p o r t , r e c o r d , o r d a t a c o mp i l a t i o n i n a n y f o r m o f

a c t s , e v e n t s , c o n d i t i o n s , o p i n i o n s , o r d i a g n o s e s ma d e a t o r n e a r t h e

t i me b y o r f r o m i n f o r ma t i o n t r a n s mi t t e d b y a p e r s o n wi t h k n o wl e d g e a n d a

b u s i n e s s d u t y t o r e c o r d o r t r a n s mi t i f k e p t i n t h e c o u r s e o f a r e g u l a r l y

c o n d u c t e d b u s i n e s s a c t i v i t y a n d i f i t wa s t h e r e g u l a r p r a c t i c e o f t h a t

b u s i n e s s a c t i v i t y t o ma k e t h e me mo r a n d u m, r e p o r t , r e c o r d , o r d a t a

c o mp i l a t i o n , a l l a s s h o wn b y t h e t e s t i mo n y o f t h e c u s t o d i a n o r o t h e r

q u a l i f i e d wi t n e s s , u n l e s s t h e s o u r c e o f i n f o r ma t i o n o f t h e me t h o d o r

c i r c u ms t a n c e s o f p r e p a r a t i o n i n d i c a t e l a c k o f t r u s t wo r t h i n e s s . Th e t e r m

?b u s i n e s s ? a s u s e d i n t h i s p a r a g r a p h i n c l u d e s e v e r y k i n d o f b u s i n e s s ,

i n s t i t u t i o n , a s s o c i a t i o n , p r o f e s s i o n , o c c u p a t i o n , a n d c a l l i n g , wh e t h e r

or not conduc t e d f or pr of i t .

5

j u r y be i ns t r uc t e d not t o c ons i de r a ny de c l a r a t i ons ma de by

t h e d e c e a s e d s ubs e que nt t o t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l . Thi s

i s s u e a ga i n de a l t wi t h t he t e s t i mony of J oa n De Bor d. The

Tr i a l J udge di d not e r r i n a l l owi ng t he j ur y t o c ons i de r t h i s

e vi d e nc e , b e c a us e i t wa s a dmi s s i bl e a s a n e xc e pt i on t o t he

h e a r s a y r ul e a l l owi ng i n r e c or ds of r e gul a r l y c onduc t e d

a c t i v i t y. Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 803( 6) .

Ne xt , de f e nda nt s a r gue t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d i n

c h a r g i ng t he Te nne s s e e Pa t t e r n J ur y I ns t r uc t i on r e l a t i ve t o

me n t a l c ompe t e nc y- me nt a l de l us i ons .

A j ur y c ha r ge wi l l not be i nva l i da t e d a s l ong a s i t

f a i r l y de f i ne s t he l e ga l i s s ue s i nvol ve d i n t he c a s e a nd do e s

n o t mi s l e a d t he j ur y. Ot i s v . Cambr i dge M ual Fi r e I ns ur a n c e

ut

Co. , 8 50 S. W 2d 439 ( Te nn. 1992) .

.

De f e nda nt s a r gue t ha t pl a i nt i f f s ’ c ompl a i nt di d n o t

a l l e ge t ha t t he de c e a s e d wa s a c t i ng unde r a de l us i on a t t he

t i me o f t he e xe c ut i on of hi s wi l l . De f e nda nt s a l s o a r gue t h a t

t h e r e wa s no pr oof t ha t de c e a s e d wa s unde r a de l us i on.

Th e r e f or e , t h e y i ns i s t t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d i n ut i l i z i ng

t h e j u r y i ns t r uc t i ons r e l a t i ng t o me nt a l c ompe t e nc y- me nt a l

d e l u s i ons .

Thi s a r gume nt i s wi t hout me r i t . To t he c ont r a r y,

d e c e d e nt ’ s i l l he a l t h, c onf us i on, a nd hi s c a pa c i t y t o dr a w u p

a wi l l we r e d i r e c t l y a t i s s ue , a s t he r e i s no a l l e ga t i on

t h e r e wa s a mi s s t a t e me nt of l a w i n t he j ur y c ha r ge .

The j ur y i ns t r uc t i ons r e ga r di ng undue i nf l ue nc e

i n f o r me d t he j ur y t ha t u ndue i nf l ue nc e c ons i s t e d of ?a c t s o r

c o n d u c t whi c h i n t he mi nd of t he t e s t a t or i s ove r c ome by t h e

wi l l o f a not he r pe r s on . . . de s t r oyi ng t he f r e e e xe r c i s e o f

6

t h e t e s t a t or , s ubs t i t ut i ng f or hi s own wi l l a not he r pe r s on’ s

wi l l . ?

Aga i n, de f e nda nt s t a ke i s s ue wi t h whe t he r t he c ha r g e

wa s s u ppor t e d by e vi de nc e , not wi t h a ny a l l e ga t i ons t ha t t h e

l a w wa s mi s s t a t e d. The j ur y c ha r ge e c hoe s t hos e a ppr ove d i n

M t c h e l v . S mi t h, 779 S. W 2d 384 ( Te nn. App. 1989) , a nd t hi s

i .

i s s u e i s t he r e f or e wi t ho ut m r i t .

e

The r e ma i ni ng i s s ue s we f i nd t o be wi t hout me r i t a s

t h e r e i s s ubs t a nt i a l ma t e r i a l e vi de nc e t o s uppor t t he j ur y’ s

s p e c i a l ve r di c t s . Ac c or di ngl y, we a f f i r m t he j udgme nt of t h e

Tr i a l Cour t a nd r e ma nd a t a ppe l l a nt s ’ c os t .

________________________

He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ __________________ ____

Ho u s t o n M Godda r d, P. J .

.

_ _ _ _ _ ______________________

Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J .

7

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.