Opinion

Beaver Wood Joint Venture v. Town of Chester

Court
Superior Court of Maine
Filed
May 8, 2008
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Kevin M. Cuddy
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.2%

The opinion

Beaver Wood v. Chester

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT

PENOBSCOT,ss Docket No. AP-07-28

k ~\l \/ ,,~ /

BEAVER WOOD JOINT VENTURE

FILED & ENTERED

SUPERIOR COURT

V

t\1t~·~ 0~ 2008

PENOBSCOT COUNTY

TOWN OF CHESTER

80B APPEAL

DECISION

Beaver Wood Joint venture (hereinafter Beaver Wood)

owned property in the Town of Chester, which was taxed by

the Town of Chester. Beaver Wood sought an abatement of

the Town of Chester's Tax assessment for 2005.

Specifically Beaver Wood sought abatement of the assessment

of $8,000,000. The Town denied Beaver Wood's abatement

request and that denial was appealed to the Penobscot

County Commissioners. The Commissioners reduced the value

from $8,000,000 to $6,500,000.

Standard for Review

There is a presumption that the assessor's valuation

is valid. Town of Southwest Harbor v. Harwood, 2000 ME

213, 763 A.2d 115, Chase v. Town of Machiasport 1998 ME

260, 721 A.2d 636, 640. To overcome the presumption the

taxpayer must present credible affirmative evidence

demonstrating that the assessor's valuation was "manifestly

wrong." Id, 763 A.2d at 117.

If, and only if, the taxpayer meets that burden, the

Commissioners must engage in "an independent determination

of fair market value... based on a consideration of all

relevant evidence of just value." Quoddy Realty Corp. v.

City of Eastport 1998 ME 14,704 A.2d 407, 408; 36 M.R.S.A.

§ 844(1); Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick 2000 ME 157.

The Superior Court is obligated to examine the entire

record to 'determine whether on the basis of all the

testimony and exhibits before the [Commissioners] they

could fairly and reasonably find the facts as [they] did.'

Ryan v. Town of Camden 582 A.2d 973, 975 (Me. 1990). The

Superior Court is not permitted to make findings

independent of those explicitly or implicitly found by the

[Commissioners] or [to] substitute its judgment for that of

the [Commissioners]." Perrin v. Town of Kittery 591 A.2d

863 (Me. 1991). Moreover, "the [Commissioner's] decision

is not wrong because the record is inconsistent or a

different conclusion could be drawn from it" Twigg v. Town

of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1995). This Court may

only reverse the County Commissioner's decision if the

record "compels a contrary conclusion to the exclusion of

all other inferences. Weekley v. Town of Scarborough 676

A.2d 932, 934 (Me. 1996); Douglas v. Board of Trustees,

669 A.2d 177, 179 (Me. 1996).

Discussion

The Town agrees that the challenged valuation was

manifestly wrong in the eyes of the County Commissioners

since they changed the assessment. Defendant notes that

the change reflected the Commissioners having evaluated the

subject property's fair market value, which implies that

the challenged valuation was manifestly wrong.

(Defendant's Brief at pg. 4)

The question that calls out is where on the record did

the Commissioners do that evaluation. It is unquestionably

true that the Commissioner's discussed the issue of value

and went to view the property in question first hand, but

there are no findings of fact anywhere on the record as far

as this Court is concerned. There is no statement by the

Commissioners of the relevant evidence of just value upon

which they relied in modifying the assessment of the Town.

By modifying the assessment the Commissioners confirm that

the assessment of Chester was manifestly wrong and that the

Plaintiff has met its burden of proof in that regard. What

the Commissioners do not do is to provide a basis for the

"just value" at which they arrived so that this Court can

make a judgment affirming their decision or concluding that

the record compels a contrary conclusion. See Weekley v.

Town of Scarborough, supra.

The Court grants this appeal and remands this matter

to the Penobscot County Commissioners for the purpose of

stating their findings leading them to their conclusions as

to just value with regard to the assessment in question.

Conclusion

The Rule 80-B Complaint is GRANTED and the matter is

remanded to the Penobscot County Commissioners to make

findings consistent with this decision.

May 8, 2008

Kevin M. Cuddy

Justice, Superior C

Date Filed 11/9/07 PENOBSCOT Docket No. AP-2007-28

County

Action _---'R"-'U"-"L=..oE"------"8:..o:0=B'---=A=.-P=-PE=A=L=--­ _

ASSIGNED TO JUSTICE KEVIN M. CunDY

BEAVER WOOD JOINT VENTURE YS. TOWN OF CHESTER

Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney

RICHARD D. VIOLETTE, ESQ RR 3, BOX 1726

POBOX 908 LINCOLN, ME 04457-9540

BREWER, ME 04412 Farrell, Rosenblatt & Russell

61 Main St Suite 1

POBox 738

Bangor ME 04402-0738

BY: Roger L. Huber, Esq.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.