Opinion

Sanger v. Town of Bowdoinham

Court
Superior Court of Maine
Filed
Feb 14, 2005
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Nancy Mills
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.1%

The opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT

SAGADAHOCG, ss CIVIL ACTION

DOCKET NO. AP-04-004

jue

TARYN SANGER,

Plaintiff

Vv. DECISION AND ORDER

TOWN OF BOWDOINHAM,

Defendant

Plaintiff appeals the denial of her request for al MY atement of her 2002-2003 real

property taxes due to poverty by the Town of Bowdoinham Board of Selectmen and

the Sagadahoc County Commissioners. R. at 1-2, 5.

The Selectmen determined that Ms. Sager misspent income on non-necessities

and the amount spent exceeded the amount due for taxes. R. at 5,9, 12.

On appeal of the Selectmen’s decision, the Commissioners determined and the

record shows that the plaintiff submitted income information for the year 2001 and

expense information for July, 2001 through June, 2002. R. at 2-3, 7-13. The taxes for

which an abatement was requested were for tax year 2002-2003. R. at 3. Because Ms.

Sager had the burden of proving that she was unable to contribute to the public

charges, information relevant to tax year 2002-2003 was required. See 36 MRS.A.

841(2) (1990); Joyce v. Town of Lyman, 565 A.2d 90, 90 (Me. 1989). Unlike in Macaro v.

Town of Windham, there is no record on which the Commissioners and this court can

determine Ms. Sanger’s financial circumstances and her ability to contribute to the

public charge for tax year 2002-2003. See Macaro v. Town of Windham, 468 A.2d 604,

606 (Me. 1983). On this appeal, Ms. Sager is , therefore, unable to show that the record

before the Commissioners “compelled a finding that [she was] indeed unable to

contribute to the public charges.” Joyce, 565 A.2d at 90.

The United States Department of Agriculture paid the plaintiff’s taxes for 2002-

2003 to preserve its mortgage. Supp. R. at 14. Any tax abatement would be sent to the

plaintiff, however, and not to the USDA. Id. Section 841(2) is designed to “prevent

towns from forcing the sale of property in order to collect taxes from those otherwise

unable to pay.” Macaro, 468 A.2d at 606. The Town did not and could not have

engaged in any such effort in this case.

The entry is

The Decision of the Sagadahoc County Commissioners is AFFIRMED.

Date: February 14, 2005 (

Nancy Millsf

Justice, Superior Court

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.