Opinion

Goodwin v. Dep't of Human Servs.

Court
Superior Court of Maine
Filed
Aug 1, 2002
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Donald H. Marden
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.1%

The opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT

CIVIL ACTION

KENNEBEC; ss. DOCKET NO. AP-01-91

~o Abpe f an

iO of

etn aw K, 2

waa M i uC iv

B. J. GOODWIN,

Petitioner

ORDER

DONALD L. GARBRECHT

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN LAW LIBRARY

SERVICES,

SEP 3 202

Respondent

This matter is before the court on respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for .. ._

review for petitioner's failure to file a petition within the time frame required by

5 M.RS.A. § 11002(3. The final decision by Kevin W. Concannon in the matter of: B.J.

Goodwin was issued October 17, 2001. The subject matter is the application of

petitioner for placement on Registry of Certified Nursing Assistants. By notice dated

December 7, 2001, the petitioner filed her petition for review with the court on

December 11, 2001. On that same date, petitioner filed a motion to accept a late filing.

In her unsworn motion, she asserts that she originally filed her petition on November

1, 2001, but the paperwork was not filled out correctly.

So I had to fill out more paperwork. I didn't hear nothing back from the

court for at least 2. to 3 weeks so I called and they told me to fill out more

paperwork so I did and I sent them out they called me back and told me

that I didn't do it write and that I was to late to even appeal it.

Respondent seeks a dismissal for petitioner's failure to file a timely petition for review.

"|. judicial enlargement of a statutorily provided period of appeal is not

possible, . . . the APA makes no provision for an extension of time limitations on judicial

review. We now state expressly that the acts time limitations are jurisdictional." Brown

v. State Dep't of Manpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981). "Statutory limitations on

appeal periods are jurisdictional." Davric Maine Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc., 751

A.2d 1024 (Me. 2000).

At oral argument, the petitioner could not explain the nature of the errors in her

paperwork causing the clerk to refuse to docket her filing. The petition for review was

due to be filed no later than November 26, 2001. This court has no means to review the

basis upon which petitioner's petition was refused. The Commissioner's decision

contained the notice advising petitioner as to the requirement of filing within 30 days of

the receipt of the decision.

Therefore, the entry will be:

Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; petition for review is

DISMISSED.

Dated: dont ‘ eer ELE

“Donald H. Marden

Justice, Superior Court

Date of

Entry

« Date Filed __12/11/01 Kennebec Docket No. APO1-91

County

Action Petition for Review

80C

| CCB Goodwin VS. Kevin Concannon, Dept, of Human Services

Plaintiff’s Attorney Defendant’s Attorney

BJ Goodwin, Pro Se Renee Guignard, AAG

P.O. Box 177 6 State House Station

Leeds, Maine 04263 Augusta, Maine 04333-0006

12/11/01

12/18/01

3/1/02

4/11/02

4/17/02

4/30/02

5/6/02

7/3/02

8/1/02

Petition for Review, filed. s/Goodwin, Pro Se

Application of Plaintiff to Proceed Without Payment of Fees, filed.

s/Goodwin, Pro Se

Indigency Affidavit, filed. s/Goodwin, Pro Se

Motion.to Accept Late Filing, filed. s/Goodwin, Pro Se

ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES, Atwood, J.

The filing fee is waived.

Copy mailed to pltf.

Certified mail-return, filed.

Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Review for Petitioner's Failure to File

the Petition Within the Time Frame Required by 5M.R.S.A., filed.

s/Guignard, AAG

Certificate of Service, filed.

Letter from attorney Guignard indicating they waive oral argument on the

motion to dismiss.

Petitioner's handwritten Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss,

filed. s/BJ Goodwin, Pro se Petitioner.

Letter from attorney Guignard indicating that she waives oral argument

on motion to dismiss and request that motion be presented to the court.

Notice of siting for 7 3 / o a

eempne

sent to attorneys of recored.

Hearing had, Hon. Donald Marden, J.

No courtroom clerk. Case under advisement.

ORDER, Marden, J.

Respondent's motion to dismiss is.GRANTED; petition for review is

DISMISSED.

Copies mailed to attys. of record.

Copies mailed to Garbrecht Law Library, Donald Goss and Deborah Firestone.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.