The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
BRADLEY J. CORNILLE, Sr., #B88097, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 24-cv-01202-SMY
)
PERCY MYERS, PINCKNEYVILLE )
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, )
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS HOSPITAL, )
JOHN DAVIDSON, JAMIE KARALES, )
CHRISTINE BROWN, JANE DOE 1, )
and JANE DOE 2, )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YANDLE, District Judge:
This matter is now before the Court for consideration of the First Amended Complaint filed
by Plaintiff Bradley Cornille, Sr. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff claims the defendants denied him medical
care and accommodations for injuries he sustained in three falls at Pinckneyville Correctional
Center in September 2023. He seeks monetary and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and Illinois state law. The First Amended
Complaint is subject to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the Court to screen
prisoner complaints and filter out any portion that is legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a
claim for relief, or seeks money damages from a defendant who is immune. Id.
First Amended Complaint
Plaintiff makes the following allegations in the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 9, pp. 1-
60): Plaintiff slipped and fell in vomit on the prison’s dayroom floor on September 1, 2023. Id. at
4-5. He sustained serious injuries to his back, neck, and head, including a loss of consciousness.
Lieutenant Dudat secured a wheelchair for Plaintiff, and Nurse Carol placed him in a neck collar.
Id. at 5. He was then transported by ambulance to Pinckneyville Community Hospital. In route,
Plaintiff lost feeling below the waist and bowel control. Although the hospital’s medical staff was
advised of his condition, they denied him diagnostic testing and treatment and released him
prematurely the same day. Id. at 5-6.
Plaintiff was re-injured the following day when he fell from his wheelchair. Id. at 6.
Just before the fall, Nurse Jane Doe 1 ordered him to move from his bed to his wheelchair without
offering any assistance. She watched and laughed as the wheelchair flipped over and Plaintiff fell
to the floor. Inmate workers Tubbs and Spivey helped him back into the wheelchair. When he
reported sharp pain on his right side, Plaintiff was taken to the emergency room at Carbondale
Memorial Hospital / Southern Illinois Hospital (SIH-MH).
At the hospital, P.A. John Davidson treated Plaintiff “less than human” because of his
status as a prisoner. When a CT scan revealed a fracture in his lower lumbar spine, Plaintiff was
given a back brace and told to see a neurosurgeon within two weeks. He was denied other basic
tests, including mobility testing, blood work, and an MRI. Plaintiff blames Defendants SIH-MH
and Davidson for denying him medical care.
When he returned to the prison, Plaintiff filed an emergency grievance to address both falls.
Plaintiff requested an ADA/RA attendant to assist him due to extreme back pain and numbness
below the waist from September 3-15, 2023. Id. In response, nurses took his vital signs but denied
his other requests per the orders of Dr. Myers. Physical therapist “Jen” and Nurse Desaray Sanders
confiscated Plaintiff’s walker on September 11, 2023, after explaining that he should not be
moving around at all. Id. at 8. Dr. Myers retaliated against Plaintiff for filing the emergency
grievance and another pending lawsuit (Case No. 22-cv-1988-MAB) by reporting that his injuries
were not serious, canceling his prescription pain medicine, and moving him out of the HCU
without a wheelchair on September 15, 2023. Dr. Myers issued Plaintiff a walker and said “he did
not care” when Plaintiff pointed out that he could not use it. Warden David Mitchell, Major
Lawless, and Nurse Sanders observed this interaction. The warden demanded a wheelchair and
an ADA cell on Plaintiff’s behalf.
Plaintiff met with Jamie Karales to request appropriate medical care and accommodations
on September 18, 2023. After learning of the above-described events, Karales said, “Your [sic]
not special Cornille[.] [D]eal with it.” Id. at 9. Plaintiff then filed two grievances about the issues.
From September 15-20, 2023, Plaintiff also filed detailed sick call slips each morning and evening
to report nonstop and intense pain in his back and numbness in his lower half.
Nurses met with Plaintiff on September 21, 2023, but offered no treatment options.
The next day, Plaintiff underwent an MRI at SIH-MR that revealed fractures and bulging discs in
his spine, which proved that Dr. Myers lied when he reported that Plaintiff’s injuries were not
serious. Dr. Myers and Health Care Unit (HCU) Administrator Christine Brown then tried to force
Plaintiff into an exam room under threat of disciplinary action, even though two other providers
agreed to meet with him.
Plaintiff injured his lower back a third time when he fell from his wheelchair while
transferring to the toilet on September 22, 2023. Id. at 10. He suffered from shooting pain in his
lower back, radiating pain in his arm, and difficulty breathing. Plaintiff pushed the emergency call
button, but no one responded. After more than 50 minutes, Sergeant Walker made rounds to pass
out mail and stopped by Plaintiff’s cell. Upon learning of Plaintiff’s new injuries, Sergeant Walker
assured Plaintiff that the nurse who was doing med rounds would arrive momentarily. C/O Jones
and Nurse Jane Doe 2 arrived 25 minutes later. When Plaintiff reported his injuries, Nurse Jane
Doe 2 became irate and screamed, “This is why I hate my f*cking life!” Id. Nurse Doe 2 then
said she would see what the HCU staff wanted to do about Plaintiff’s latest injury after she
completed her rounds. She left and never returned. Id. at 10-11.
From September 22-24, 2023, Plaintiff filed nurse sick call slips every morning and
evening to report excruciating back pain, numbness in his lower half, and re-injury on
September 22, 2023. Id. at 11. By September 24, 2023, Plaintiff could not sit up in bed.
The gallery correctional officer called a medical emergency. Nurse Lori arrived and helped
Plaintiff sit up, took his vitals, gave him medicine, and scheduled an appointment with a nurse
practitioner the next day. In the process, Nurse Lori said that Nurse Jane Doe 2 made no record
of Plaintiff’s re-injury because she was only concerned about her “vcay.” Id.
Plaintiff met with Nurse Brooke, Major Lawless, and Warden Mitchell around 9:15 on
September 25, 2023. After hearing about his recent injuries and treatment, Warden Mitchell and
Major Lawless both stated that Dr. Myers lied to them ten days earlier when they inquired about
Plaintiff’s condition. At that point, Plaintiff submitted a formal written request for protection from
Dr. Myers. Id. at 12. Warden Mitchell, Major Lawless, and Lieutenant Frank agreed to protect
him. The same evening, Plaintiff mailed an emergency request to A/W Karales and HCU
Administrator Brown to lodge a complaint against Dr. Myers with OIG and Wexford Health
Sources, Inc. They disregarded the request. Instead, HCU Administrator Brown and Dr. Myers
attempted to coerce Plaintiff to meet with Dr. Myers on September 26, 2023, saying “[w]e do not
care about your concerns.” Id.
In protest, Plaintiff went on a hunger strike on September 27, 2023. Id. at 12-13.
C/O Brandy responded by escorting Plaintiff to the HCU to meet with a new medical provider,
P.A. Desai, who explained that Dr. Myers’ alterations of Plaintiff’s medical records were so
extensive the P.A. Desai could not comprehend the full scope of his medical issues or understand
why Plaintiff had not been referred for neurosurgery. Id. at 13. Desai agreed to order the collegial
review for neurosurgery without further delay. On September 29, 2023, A/W Karales spoke with
Plaintiff while touring the wing and denied Plaintiff’s request to file a complaint against Dr. Myers.
Plaintiff filed detailed sick call slips each morning and night from September 27, 2023 to
October 19, 2023, prompting ISI Billy Stanhouse to interview Plaintiff on October 4, 2023. Id. at
14. When the investigator asked Plaintiff if he would like to transfer to a minimum security prison
with better medical care, Plaintiff agreed that he would prefer to do so. Plaintiff requested
emergency medical care two days later, and C/O McVey and C/O Adamski summoned Nurse
Whitney who noted ten unfulfilled sick call requests on file. Plaintiff wrote a staff grievance to
complain about the failure of A/W Karales and HCU Administrator Brown to file an OIG
complaint about Dr. Myers. Plaintiff separately reported staff misconduct at Pinckneyville a week
after he transferred to Robinson Correctional Center on October 23, 2023. Id. at 15.
Preliminary Dismissals
Plaintiff mentions the following individuals in the statement of his claim but does not
identify them as defendants in the First Amended Complaint: Warden David Mitchell, Lieutenant
Dudat, Nurse Carol, Inmate Tubbs, Inmate Spivey, Physical therapist “Jen,” Nurse Desaray
Sanders, Sergeant Walker, C/O Jones, Lieutenant Frank, Major Lawless, C/O Brandy, P.A. Desai,
Billy Stanhouse, C/O McVey, C/O Adamski, Nurse Whitney, Wexford, and miscellaneous nurses.
The Court will not treat these individuals as defendants, and all claims against them are considered
dismissed without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 10(a) (noting that the title of the complaint “must
name all the parties”).
Discussion
The Court designates the following claims in the pro se First Amended Complaint:
Count 1: Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants for exhibiting deliberate
indifference to Plaintiff’s head, neck, and back injuries sustained during
three separate falls at the prison on September 1, 2, and 22, 2023.
Count 2: First Amendment claim against Defendant Myers for denying Plaintiff
adequate medical care, a wheelchair, and an ADA cell in retaliation for
filing a prior lawsuit and emergency grievances against the doctor.
Count 3: Claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101
et seq., and/or Rehabilitation Act (Rehab Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 794–94,
against Defendants for failing to accommodate Plaintiff’s physical
disabilities that resulted from three falls in September 2023 and necessitated
the use of a wheelchair, ADA cell, and ADA attendant at the prison.
Count 4: Illinois state law claim against Defendants for medical negligence, based on
their inadequate treatment of Plaintiff’s head, neck, and back injuries
sustained during falls at the prison on September 1, 2, and 22, 2023.
Any other claim mentioned in the First Amended Complaint, but not addressed herein, is
considered dismissed without prejudice as inadequately pled under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).
Count 1
An Eighth Amendment violation occurs when a government official acts with deliberate
indifference to an inmate’s serious medical needs and causes the unnecessary and wanton infliction
of pain. Rodgers v. Rankin, 99 F.4th 415, 419 (7th Cir. 2024). To state a viable claim, a plaintiff
must plead facts suggesting that he suffered from an objectively serious medical need and that the
defendant(s) responded with deliberate indifference. Petties v. Carter, 836 F.3d 722, 728 (7th Cir.
2016). Plaintiff’s alleged head, neck, and back injuries suggest the existence of a serious medical
need. The injuries were diagnosed as requiring treatment by a neurosurgeon. Plaintiff’s
allegations also suggest that the following individuals knew of and disregarded Plaintiff’s injuries
and ongoing complaints of pain, numbness, and immobility resulting from his falls: Defendants
Myers, Karales, Brown, Doe 1, and Doe 2.
However, the allegations articulate no constitutional claim against Pinckneyville
Community Hospital, Southern Illinois Hospital (SIH-MH), or P.A. Davidson. To state such a
claim, Plaintiff must sufficiently allege that the hospitals and medical provider engaged in state
action that subjected them to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although Plaintiff sets forth
conclusory allegations to this effect, he fails to plead deliberate indifference on the part of the
hospitals or its staff.
Following a CT scan to diagnose his injuries, Plaintiff was issued a back brace and was
recommended for treatment by a neurosurgeon. Plaintiff’s claim against these defendants hinges
on the denial of his preferred diagnostic testing and treatment. However, while inmates are entitled
to adequate care, they are not entitled to their preferred course of treatment. Johnson v. Doughty,
433 F.3d 1001, 1013 (7th Cir. 2006).
Count 1 will proceed against Defendants Myers, Karales, Brown, Doe 1, and Doe 2. This
claim will be dismissed without prejudice against Pinckneyville Community Hospital, Southern
Illinois Hospital (SIH-MH), and P.A. Davidson for failure to state a claim.
Count 2
An inmate has a First Amendment right to file grievances and lawsuits. Watkins v. Kasper,
599 F.3d 791, 798 (7th Cir. 2010). In order to bring a claim for retaliation in this context, a plaintiff
must plead facts suggesting that: (1) he engaged in constitutionally protected speech; (2) he
suffered a deprivation likely to deter the protected speech; and (3) his protected speech was a
motivating factor in the defendant’s actions. Antoine v. Ramos, 497 F. App’x 631, 634 (7th Cir.
2012).
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Myers retaliated against him for filing emergency
grievances in September 2023 and Case No. 22-cv-1988-MAB by misrepresenting the seriousness
of his injuries, canceling his prescription pain medicine, moving him out of the HCU, confiscating
his wheelchair, issuing him a walker, denying him an ADA attendant, and denying him placement
in an ADA cell. Based on these allegations, Count 2 will receive further review against Defendant
Myers. The allegations are insufficient to state a retaliation claim against the other defendants.
Therefore, this claim will be dismissed without prejudice against all others.
Count 3
A plaintiff bringing claims under the ADA or Rehab Act must allege that (1) he is a
qualified person with a disability; (2) he was denied the benefits of the services, programs, or
activities of a public entity or otherwise subjected to discrimination by the entity; and (3) the denial
or discrimination was because of his disability. Jaros v. Ill. Dep’t of Corr., 684 F.3d 667, 672 (7th
Cir. 2012). Plaintiff alleges that he suffered physical injuries from three falls at the prison in
September 2023, which qualified him as a person with a disability and necessitated a wheelchair,
ADA cell, and ADA attendant. Without these accommodations, Plaintiff was allegedly unable to
mobilize inside or outside his cell. The claim is appropriately brought against the state agency
(i.e., Illinois Department of Corrections) or a state official acting in an official capacity (i.e.,
Warden, in an official capacity). Id. at 670 (citing 29 U.S.C. § 794(b); 42 U.S.C. § 12131).
Therefore, Count 3 will receive further review against the current Warden of Pinckneyville
Correctional Center, in an official capacity. This claim will be dismissed with prejudice against
all other defendants.
Count 4
Because a medical negligence claim in Illinois derives from the same facts as the federal
claims, this Court will exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count 4. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). To
proceed with the negligence claim, Plaintiff must allege that each defendant owed him a duty of
care, breached the duty, and the breach was the proximate cause of his injuries. Thompson v.
Gordon, 948 N.E. 2d 39, 45 (Ill. 2011). The allegations articulate a claim against Defendants
Myers, Karales, Brown, Doe 1, and Doe 2.
However, Plaintiff has not provided the affidavit and physicians report required under
735 ILL. COMP. STAT. § 5/2-622 stating that there is a reasonable and meritorious cause for
litigation of the medical negligence claim against each defendant. Young v. United States, 924
F.3d 349 (7th Cir. 2019). While Plaintiff’s failure to file the affidavit and report is not dispositive
of his claim at this stage, he must comply with § 5/2-622 to survive summary judgment. Count 4
will be allowed to proceed against Defendants Myers, Karales, Brown, Doe 1, and Doe 2. Because
the allegations fail to state a claim against Pinckneyville Community Hospital, Southern Illinois
Hospital (SIH-MH), or P.A. Davidson. Count 4 will be dismissed without prejudice against these
defendants.
Identification of Unknown Defendants
Counts 1 and 4 survive screening against Nurses Jane Doe 1 and 2. These defendants must
be identified with particularity, so the lawsuit can be served on them. The plaintiff will have an
opportunity to engage in limited discovery to ascertain the identity of the defendants. Rodriguez
v. Plymouth Ambulance Serv., 577 F.3d 816, 832 (7th Cir. 2009). The Warden of Pinckneyville
Correctional Center will be added as a defendant in his or her official capacity for purposes of
responding to discovery aimed at identifying the unknown defendant. Once the names of the
unknown nurses are discovered, Plaintiff must file a motion to substitute the newly identified
defendants in place of the generic designations in the caption and First Amended Complaint.
Disposition
The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 9) survives screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as
follows:
• COUNT 1 will proceed against PERCY MYERS, JAMIE KARALES,
CHRISTINE BROWN, NURSE JANE DOE 1, and NURSE JANE DOE 2, in
their individual capacities. This claim is DISMISSED without prejudice against
ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS for failure to state a claim.
• COUNT 2 will proceed against PERCY MYERS, in an individual capacity. This
claim is DISMISSED without prejudice against ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS
for failure to state a claim.
• COUNT 3 will proceed against the WARDEN OF PINCKNEYVILLE
CORRECTIONAL CENTER, in an official capacity. This claim is DISMISSED
with prejudice against ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS for failure to state a claim.
• COUNT 4 will proceed against PERCY MYERS, JAMIE KARALES,
CHRISTINE BROWN, NURSE JANE DOE 1, and NURSE JANE DOE 2. This
claim is DISMISSED without prejudice against ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS
for failure to state a claim.
• The CURRENT WARDEN OF PINCKNEYVILLE CORRECTIONAL
CENTER is hereby ADDED as a defendant, in an official capacity, in connection
with the ADA/Rehab Act claim in COUNT 3, the identification of Nurses Jane Doe
1 and 2 in COUNTS 1 and 4, and the request for injunctive relief.
The Clerk shall prepare for Defendants PERCY MYERS, JAMIE KARALES,
CHRISTINE BROWN, NURSE JANE DOE 1, NURSE JANE DOE 2, in their individual
capacities, and the CURRENT WARDEN OF PINCKNEYVILLE CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, in his official capacity only: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive
Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). The Clerk is
DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 9), and this
Memorandum and Order to each Defendant’s place of employment as identified by Plaintiff. If a
Defendant fails to sign and return the Waiver of Service of Summons (Form 6) to the Clerk within
30 days from the date the forms were sent, the Clerk shall take appropriate steps to effect formal
service on Defendant. The Court will require that Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service,
as authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
If a Defendant cannot be found at the work address provided by Plaintiff, the employer
shall furnish the Clerk with that Defendant’s current work address, or, if not known, the
Defendant’s last-known address. This information shall be used only for sending the forms as
directed above or for formally effecting service. Any documentation of the address shall be
retained only by the Clerk and shall not be maintained in the court file or disclosed by the Clerk.
Defendants are ORDERED to timely file appropriate responsive pleading to the First
Amended Complaint (Doc. 9) and shall not waive filing a reply pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g).
Plaintiff is ADVISED that if judgment is rendered against him and the judgment includes
the payment of costs under 28 U.S.C. §1915, he will be required to pay the full amount of the
costs, even though he was granted in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(f)(2)(A).
Plaintiff is further ADVISED that he is under a continuing obligation to keep the Clerk of
Court and the opposing parties informed of any change in his address; the Court will not
independently investigate his whereabouts. This shall be done in writing and not later than 14 days
after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to comply with this order will cause a
delay in the transmission of court documents and may result in dismissal of this action for want of
prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to ENTER the Court’s standard HIPAA-Qualified
Protective Order; ADD the CURRENT WARDEN OF PINCKNEYVILLE
CORRECTIONAL CENTER, in an official capacity only, as a defendant in CM/ECF; and
TERMINATE Defendants PINCKNEYVILLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SOUTHERN
ILLINOIS HOSPITAL, and JOHN DAVIDSON as defendants in CM/ECF.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 1/23/2025
s/ Staci M. Yandle
STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge
Notice to Plaintiff
Once identified, the Court will take the necessary steps to notify the Defendants of your
lawsuit and serve them with a copy of your First Amended Complaint. After service has been
achieved, Defendants will enter their appearances and file Answers to your First Amended
Complaint. It will likely take at least 60 days from the date they are served with this lawsuit to
receive the Answers, but it is entirely possible that it will take 90 days or more. When Defendants
have all filed Answers, the Court will enter a Scheduling Order containing important information
on deadlines, discovery, and procedures. Plaintiff is advised to wait until counsel has appeared for
Defendants before filing any motions, to give the Defendants notice and an opportunity to respond
to those motions. Motions filed before Defendants’ attorneys have filed appearances will generally
be denied as premature. Plaintiff need not submit any evidence to the Court at this time, unless
specifically directed to do so.