Opinion

DOUGHERTY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IAN M. DOUGHERTY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

Vv. ) Civil Action No. 3:22-212

) Judge Nora Barry Fischer

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION _ ) Magistrate Judge Keith Pesto

AND PAROLE, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2025, upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on June 7, 2023, (Docket

No. 11), recommending that the § 2254 habeas petition filed by Petitioner Ian M. Dougherty

against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al., wherein he challenges the denial of

parole and seeks release from state custody to parole, be denied, without a certificate of

appealability, Petitioner’s objections which were timely filed within 14 days as directed by the

Magistrate Judge, (Docket No. 13), and upon independent review of the record and de novo

consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of December 18, 2024,

(Docket No. 11), which is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court, as supplemented herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Objections (Docket No. 13) are

OVERRULED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition (Docket No. 6) is DENIED, for the reasons

set forth in the Report and Recommendation. It also appears to the Court from the DOC Inmate

Locator that the Petitioner has been released on parole such that the Petition (Docket No. 6) must

be DISMISSED, as moot, see e.g., Malik v. Warden Loretto FCI, No. 23-2281, 2024 WL 3649570,

at *2 (3d Cir. Aug. 5, 2024) (“Because Malik had been released to prerelease custody, his request

for release to such custody was moot.”); Lee v. Superintendent Greene SCI, No. 15-2412, 2016 WL

11786206, at *1 (3d Cir. Jan. 13, 2016) (denying certificate of appealability to petitioner regarding

habeas petition challenging denial of parole because he was released from custody on parole and

did not show any collateral consequences such that his petition was moot); Fitzgerald v.

Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 2024 WL 4755397, at *2 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2024)

(“Fitzgerald is no longer incarcerated. He was granted parole in July 2024 and was released to

parole in October 2024. Accordingly, there is no relief that this Court can provide to him and this

habeas case is now moot.”);

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue as Petitioner has

not made a substantial showing of a denial of a Constitutional right; and,

FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

s/Nora Barry Fischer

Nora Barry Fischer

Senior U.S. District Judge

cc/ecf: Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto

ce: IAN M. DOUGHERTY

MN-7987

SCI HOUTZDALE

P.O. Box 1000

209 Institution Drive

Houtzdale, PA 16698-1000 (via first class mail)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.