Opinion

Rickye Henderson v. Armbrust & Brown, PLLC; David King; Guillermo Alarcon; And Ali Arabzadegan

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00410-CV

NO. 03-24-00509-CV

Rickye Henderson, Appellant

v.

Armbrust & Brown, PLLC; David King; Guillermo Alarcon; and Ali Arabzadegan,

Appellees

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-24-003064, HONORABLE F. SCOTT MCCOWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this Court’s cause number 03-24-00410-CV, Rickye Henderson brought an

interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order declaring him a vexatious litigant. See Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.101(a) (authorizing court to enter order prohibiting person from filing,

pro se, new litigation in court without permission of appropriate local administrative judge),

(c) (authorizing appeal from prefiling order entered under Subsection (a)). In this Court’s cause

number 03-24-00509-CV, Henderson appeals from the trial court’s order granting motion to

dismiss and final judgment. The trial court dismissed Henderson’s claims because he did not

furnish security to proceed after he was declared a vexatious litigant. See id. § 11.056 (requiring

court to dismiss litigation as to moving defendant if plaintiff ordered to furnish security does not

furnish security within time set by order).

On January 6, 2025, appellees advised the Court by letter that the interlocutory

appeal in this Court’s cause number 03-24-00410-CV had been rendered procedurally moot by

the trial court’s entry of a final judgment. They request that this Court dismiss the appeal or

consolidate the two appeals. At this juncture, the briefing has been completed in both cases, and

Henderson’s challenge to the interlocutory order declaring him a vexatious litigant has merged

into the final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.3; Chen v. Razberi Techs., Inc., 645 S.W.3d 773,

779 (Tex. 2022) (agreeing that Rule 27.3 applied and that “court of appeals erred in failing to

treat the appeal of the special appearance order as an appeal from the final judgment into which

the ruling merged”). In this context, we consolidate the two above-referenced cause numbers for

all purposes. The issues, records, and documents filed in cause number 03-24-00410-CV are

consolidated into cause number 03-24-00509-CV. The consolidated appeal shall proceed under

cause number 03-24-00509-CV, and cause number 03-24-00410-CV is hereby dismissed. 1

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Ellis

03-24-00410-CV Dismissed

03-24-00509-CV Consolidated

Filed: January 10, 2025

1 We also deny Henderson’s pending motions before this Court in cause number

03-24-00410-CV.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.