Opinion

Akhenaten v. Brown

Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.5%

“An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint.”

How later courts described this case

  • “An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

ALI AKHENATEN,

Plaintiff,

Vv. CASE NO. 3:24-cv-481-WWB-SJH

FABIANA BROWN,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 6, 2024. Doc. 19.

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Supporting Memorandum of Law,

Doc. 4, filed on May 20, 2024, and directed to the original complaint, is denied as

moot.! See Malowney v. Federal Collection Deposit Group, 193 F.3d 1342, 1345 n.1 (11th

Cir. 1999) (“An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint.”).

DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, on December 23, 2024.

[Z J. Horovitz

United States Magistrate Judge

' This Order does not address the Amended Complaint, Doc. 19, or Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Supporting Memorandum, Doc. 20, which are

the subject of a Report and Recommendation entered on December 19, 2024, Doc. 24.

Copies to:

Pro Se Plaintiff

Counsel of Record

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.