Opinion

Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLC

  • 123 F.4th 840
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Status
Published
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.7%

The opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)

File Name: 24a0271p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

┐

DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN

│

DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD

│

FREEMAN; CHRISTOPHER GILES; LOUIS RAY; RICHARD

│

SULLIVAN; JAMES NORVELL; MICHAEL BANKS; GUY

│

CLARK; MARIA BARALLARDOS; CARY SHERROW; >

JASON KEVIN SINCLAIR; KIMBERLY COULSON; TROY │ No. 23-1940

COULSON; ANDRE MCQUADE; DONALD DYKSHORN; │

TAIT THOMAS; JAMES PAUL BROWNE; WILLIAM │

FREDO; JON ELLARD; RHIANNA MEYERS; RANDALL │

JACOBS; MICHAEL PONDER; PHILIP WEEKS; KATRINA │

FREDO; JIMMY FLOWERS; STEVEN BRACK; KEVIN │

WESLEY; BRIAN LLOYD; GREGORY BUTSCHA; JERRY │

CARROLL; KIMBERLY CARROLL; DOMINIC EATHERTON; │

THOMAS EDMONDSON; RICHARD FILIAGGI; ROBERT │

HIGGINS; DAVID THOMPSON; DONALD SICURA, │

Plaintiffs-Appellees, │

│

│

v. │

│

GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, │

Defendant-Appellant. │

┘

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.

Nos. 2:19-cv-11044; 2:19-cv-11802; 2:19-cv-11808; 2:19-cv-11875;

2:19-cv-12371—David M. Lawson, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: December 19, 2024

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE,

STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER,

MURPHY, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.*

*

Hon. Stephanie Dawkins Davis is recused from participation in this case.

No. 23-1940 Speerly, et al. v. General Motors, LLC Page 2

_________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Richard C. Godfrey, R. Allan Pixton,

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, John F. Bash,

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Austin, Texas, Renee D. Smith, Cole

T. Carter, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Jason M. Wilcox, KIRKLAND &

ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., Stephanie A. Douglas, BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC, Troy,

Michigan, for Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Douglas J. McNamara, Karina Puttieva, Madelyn

Petersen, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Washington, D.C., Theodore J.

Leopold, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for

Appellees. ON BRIEF: John M. Thomas, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan,

Kyle M. Asher, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Lansing, Michigan, Stephen A. D’Aunoy, KLEIN

THOMAS LEE & FRESARD, St. Louis, Missouri, Brandon L. Boxler, KLEIN THOMAS LEE

& FRESARD, Richmond, Virginia, Brian D. Schmalzbach, MCGUIREWOODS LLP,

Richmond, Virginia, Wendy Liu, PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP, Washington, D.C.,

for Amici Curiae.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en

banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc

vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case

on the docket as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are

vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for

oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________________________________

Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.