Opinion

Board of Mgrs. of the 130 W. 17th St. Condominium v. Rubin Museum of Art

  • 2024 NY Slip Op 34275(U)
Court
New York Supreme Court, New York County
Filed
Dec 3, 2024
Status
Unpublished
Author
Emily Morales-Minerva
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.3%

The opinion

Board of Mgrs. of the 130 W. 17th St. Condominium v

Rubin Museum of Art

2024 NY Slip Op 34275(U)

December 3, 2024

Supreme Court, New York County

Docket Number: Index No. 152216/2023

Judge: Emily Morales-Minerva

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York

State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official

publication.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/2024 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 152216/2023

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. EMILY MORALES-MINERVA PART 42M

Justice

-------------------X INDEX NO. 152216/2023

THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 130 WEST 17TH

MOTION DATE Oct. 30, 2024

STREET CONDOMINIUM, ON BEHALF OF ALL UNIT

OWNERS,

MOTION SEQ. NO. .._00...,4.__ __

Plaintiff,

- V-

DECISION + ORDER

RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART A/KIA SHELLY AND DONALD

RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST, FORMATION NYC

LLC,HACKD FITNESS, LLC,D/B/A PRTL

Defendant.

-------------------X

APPEARANCES:

Braverman Greenspun, P.C., New York, NY (Kelly Ann

Ringston, Esq., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York, NY (Matthew

Ethan Hearle, Esq., of counsel), for defendant RUBIN MUSEUM

OF ART A/K/A SHELLY AND DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST.

Patrick Doerr PLLC, New York, NY (Mark Thomas Doerr, Esq.,

of counsel), for defendant FORMATION NYC LLC.

The Price Law Firm LLC, New York, NY (Joshua C. Price,

Esq., of counsel) for defendant HACKD FITNESS, LLC D/B/A/

PRTL.

HON. EMILY MORALES-MINERVA, J.S.C.:

In this breach of contract action, non-party The Price Law

Firm, LLC (law firm} -- counsel for defendant HACKD FITNESS, LLC

D/B/A PRTL (client) -- moves, by order to show cause (mot. seq.

no. 004), for an order permitting it to withdraw from such

representation and for an order staying this action for 60 days

152216/2()23 THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 130 WEST 17TH STREET CONDOMINIUM, Page 1 of4

ON BEHALF OF ALL UNIT OWNERS vs. RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AJKJA SHELLY AND DONALD

RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST ET AL

Motion No. 004

1 of 4

[* 1]

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/2024 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 152216/2023

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2024

thereafter. The record on this application includes proof of

service on defendants (see NYSCEF Doc. No. 55, affidavit of

service, dated November 21, 2024), and the matter was returnable

in Part 42M, on November 25, 2024, at 3:00 P.M.

At the call of the calendar, all parties appeared, except

for defendant HACKD FITNESS, LLC D/B/A PRTL. Said defendant did

not contact the court with an excuse or request for an

adjournment, and no parties raised any opposition to the motion.

For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the

application entirely.

An attorney may only withdraw as counsel upon a showing of

good and sufficient cause, and reasonable notice (see CPLR § 321

[b] [2]; see also Bok v Werner, 9 AD3d 318 [1st Dept 2004]). The

question of whether good cause exists lies within the sound

discretion of the court (see Rivadeneria v New York City Health

& Hosps. Corp., 306 AD2d 394 [2d Dept 2003]). Further, an

attorney may withdraw as counsel if the client's failure to

communicate with counsel renders the representation unreasonably

difficult, undermining counsel's ability to represent the client

effectively (see Raff & Becker LLP v Kaiser Saurborn & Ma-ir,

P.C., 160 AD3d 479 [1st Dept 2018]; see also Bankers Trust Co. v

Hogan, 187 AD2d 305 [1st Dept 1992]).

152216/2023 THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 130 WEST 17TH STREET CONDOMINIUM, Page 2 of 4

ON BEHALF OF ALL UNIT OWNERS vs. RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART A/KIA SHELLY AND DONALD

RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST ET AL

Motion No. 004

2 of 4

[* 2]

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/2024 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 152216/2023

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2024

Here, non-party law firm has made a sufficient showing of

good cause for withdrawal based upon client's failure to

communicate and cooperate with law firm's representation (see

NYSCEF Doc. No. 53, Affirmation of Joshua C. Price, Esq.).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause (mot. seq. no. 004) is

granted; it is further

ORDERED that non-party The Price Law Firm, LLC is permitted

to withdraw and is relieved as counsel for defendant HACKD

FITNESS, LLC D/B/A PRTL; it is further

ORDERED that this action is stayed for a period of 60 days

from the date of entry of this order to allow defendant HACKD

FITNESS, LLC D/B/A sufficient time to retain new counsel, and

that said defendant shall notify this court, in writing, within

the 60-day period as to incoming counsel's name and address; and

it is further

ORDERED that non-party The Price Law Firm, LLC shall serve

a copy of this order with notice of entry upon defendant HACKD

FITNESS, LLC D/B/A PRTL and all other parties within 10 days of

entry.

152216/2023 THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 130 WEST 17TH STREET CONDOMINIUM, Page 3 of 4

ON BEHALF OF ALL UNIT OWNERS vs. RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART A/KIA SHELLY AND DONALD

RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST ET AL

Motion No. 004

3 of 4

[* 3]

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/2024 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 152216/2023

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2024

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

,. ,...,. 1J ~ .,,.,~7"'~ •v::"' A, .~tt.'t,

~ 1/~-r~,--L,u ..~~

12/3/2024

8

DATE EMILY MORALES-MINERVA, J.S.C.

CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER

APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

152216/2023 THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 130 WEST 17TH STREET CONDOMINIUM, Page4of4

ON BEHALF OF ALL UNIT OWNERS vs. RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART A/KIA SHELLY AND DONALD

RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST ET AL

Motion No. 004

4 of 4

[* 4]

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.