Opinion

Agensys, Inc. v. The Regents of The University of California

Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.1%

The opinion

1

2

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

6 AGENSYS, INC. and ASTELLAS

Case No. 2:24-cv-03961-JFW (PDx)

7 PHARMA, INC.,

8 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

9 v.

(PD Version)

10

HANS DAVID ULMERT and

11 NORBERT PEEKHAUS, ☐ Check if submitted without material

12 modifications to PD form

Defendants.

13

14

15 1. INTRODUCTION

16 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

17 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,

18 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

19 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may

20 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to

21 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this

22 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to

23 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends

24 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

25 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth

26 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to

27 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the

1 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party

2 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

3 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

4 Good cause exists for entry of this Stipulated Protective Order because this is

5 an action for alleged trade secret misappropriation. It is likely to involve proprietary

6 information, such as the parties’ alleged trade secrets and related highly confidential

7 information, proprietary research and development technologies and techniques,

8 non-public research and development data and information regarding biotechnology

9 product candidates, and research and development strategy and planning, for which

10 special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than

11 prosecution of this action is warranted. See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of

12 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) (“[C]ompelling reasons sufficient to

13 outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist

14 when such court files might have become a vehicle for improper purposes, such as

15 the . . . release of trade secrets.” (citation omitted); Skillz Platform Inc. v.

16 AviaGames Inc., No. 21-CV-02436-BLF, 2023 WL 8430369, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec.

17 4, 2023) (“Good cause exists to seal trade secrets.”).

18 The same is true for “confidential business information that would harm a

19 party’s competitive standing.” Id.; see also Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler

20 Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016); In re Electronic Arts, Inc., 298

21 Fed. Appx. 586,569 (9th Cir. 2008); Table de France, Inc. v. DBC Corp., 2019 WL

22 6894521, at *2 (C.D. Cal. 2019). Confidential business information includes

23 competitively sensitive financial information, internal forecasts and budgeting, and

24 confidential business agreements with third parties.

25 Based on information requested, including that described herein, the Parties

26 anticipate that they will disclose highly sensitive trade secret, financial, and/or

27 proprietary information. Confidential trade secret, financial, and/or proprietary

1 information of third parties may also be disclosed. It is important that this

2 information remain protected and not be readily available due to the protection of

3 business competition interests. The unrestricted or unprotected disclosure of such

4 trade secret, financial and/or business information would result in prejudice or harm

5 to the producing party and third parties by revealing their information which could

6 result in loss of business and/or violation of federal and state laws and regulations

7 regarding the exportation of technical data. Therefore, a two-tiered protective order

8 is proper and necessary here to narrow the universe of persons with whom highly

9 sensitive information can be shared.

10 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt

11 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately

12 protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the

13 Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for

14 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and

15 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this

16 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as

17 Confidential or Highly Confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so

18 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential,

19 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public

20 record of this case.

21 2. DEFINITIONS

22 2.1 Action: Agensys, Inc., et al. v. Hans David Ulmert, et. al., No. 2:24-cv-

23 03961-JFW (PDx) (C.D. Cal.).

24 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the

25 designation of information or items under this Order.

26 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of

27 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for

1 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in

2 the Good Cause Statement.

3 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House

4 Counsel (as well as their support staff).

5 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or

6 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as

7 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

8 ONLY.”

9 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless

10 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,

11 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or

12 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

13 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter

14 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as

15 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.

16 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

17 Information or Items: any non-public technical, research, development, regulatory,

18 operational, commercial, non-public personal, financial, marketing, strategic

19 planning information, pricing and cost data, or any other competitive information,

20 whether oral or in documentary or other tangible form, so designated by any

21 Producing Party that it reasonably and in good faith believes is of the type

22 protectable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other applicable law or is

23 required to be kept Confidential by law or by agreement with a third party or

24 otherwise.

25 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.

26 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside

27 counsel.

1 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or

2 other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action.

3 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a

4 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and

5 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm

6 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.

7 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,

8 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their

9 support staffs).

10 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or

11 Discovery Material in this Action.

12 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation

13 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or

14 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)

15 and their employees and subcontractors.

16 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is

17 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

18 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

19 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery

20 Material from a Producing Party.

21 3. SCOPE

22 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only

23 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or

24 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or

25 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or

26 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

27

1 Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by the orders of the

2 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.

3 4. DURATION

4 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations

5 imposed by this Order will remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees

6 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition will be

7 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with

8 prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all

9 appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time

10 limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

11 applicable law.

12 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

13 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

14 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under

15 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that

16 qualifies under the appropriate standards. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized

17 designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or

18 that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the

19 case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other

20 parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

21 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it

22 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must

23 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.

24 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in

25 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise

26 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection

27

1 under this Order must be clearly so designated before or at the time that the material

2 is disclosed or produced.

3 Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

4 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,

5 but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that

6 the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter

7 “CONFIDENTIAL legend”) or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

8 EYES ONLY” (hereinafter “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

9 ONLY legend”) to each page that contains protected material.

10 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for

11 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has

12 indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the

13 inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for

14 inspection will be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

15 ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied

16 and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions

17 thereof, qualify for protection and what level of protection under this Order. Then,

18 before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the

19 “CONFIDENTIAL legend” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

20 EYES ONLY legend,” as appropriate, to each page that contains Protected Material.

21 (b) for testimony given in depositions or in other pretrial or trial proceedings

22 that the Designating Party identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the

23 record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected

24 testimony. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony

25 that is entitled to protection and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony

26 may qualify for protection, the Designating Party may invoke on the record (before

27 the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 21

1 days after receipt of the deposition transcript to identify and inform all parties of the

2 specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those

3 portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the

4 21 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.

5 Parties shall give the other parties reasonable notice (a minimum of two

6 business days) if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing, or other proceeding

7 to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only

8 authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

9 Bound” (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an

10 exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as

11 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

12 ONLY.”

13 Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the

14 title page that the transcript contains Protected Material. The Designating Party

15 shall inform the court reporter of this requirement. Any transcript that is prepared

16 before the expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that

17 period as if it had been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

18 EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that

19 period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated.

20 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for

21 any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the

22 exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the

23 legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

24 EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the information warrants protection,

25 the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, will identify the protected portion(s).

26 5.3 Redactions. Documents and things produced or made available for

27 inspection may be subject to redaction, in good faith by the Producing Party, of

1 information that the Producing Party believes is (i) information subject to privacy

2 and security protection under The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability

3 Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) or other applicable US or foreign data security and privacy

4 laws or regulations, (ii) subject to the attorney-client privilege, or (iii) subject to

5 attorney work-product or other immunity from production. Each such redaction,

6 regardless of size, shall be clearly labeled as redacted, such as by black-boxing the

7 redacted text. Information involving the privacy interests of one or more individuals

8 or subject to data privacy restrictions (such as social security numbers, dates of

9 birth, private addresses or telephone numbers, or other personal information) can be

10 redacted in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. This paragraph shall

11 not be construed as a waiver of any party’s right to seek disclosure of redacted

12 information. All redactions based on relevance or scope shall be marked as “Not

13 Relevant” or a similar marking. All redactions based on privacy or security shall be

14 marked as “Privacy” or a similar marking. All redactions based on attorney-client

15 privilege or work-product immunity shall be marked as “Privilege” or a similar

16 marking. Any materials marked with a “Privilege” or similar designation are not

17 required to be listed on a privilege log in the first instance. Upon a showing of

18 good cause, the Receiving Party may request that the producing party log a

19 privilege-redacted document. The Parties agree that no Party is required to identify

20 on its respective privilege log any document or communication dated after the filing

21 of the Complaint in the Action. The Parties shall exchange their respective privilege

22 logs, if any, at a time to be agreed upon by the Parties following the production of

23 documents, or as otherwise ordered by the Court.

24 5.4 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent

25 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive

26 the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material.

27 Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable

1 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this

2 Order.

3 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

4 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a

5 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s

6 Scheduling Order.

7 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party will initiate the dispute

8 resolution process (and, if necessary, file a discovery motion) under Local Rule 37.1

9 et seq.

10 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding will be on

11 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper

12 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other

13 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating

14 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties will

15 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is

16 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the

17 challenge.

18 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

19 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is

20 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this

21 Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action.

22 Specifically, all Protected Material shall be used solely for this Action or any related

23 proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, including, for example, but

24 not limited to (a) any business, proprietary, or commercial purpose; (b) use in

25 connection with the prosecution of patents or patent applications, including in

26 connection with the prosecution of patent applications relating to the subject matter

27 of this Action, any claims in any reissue, interference, reexamination, inter partes

1 review, post-grant review, or any contested proceeding before the U.S. Patent &

2 Trademark Office or any foreign patent office; and/or (c) use in connection with any

3 formulation, scientific research, development, or manufacturing activities

4 concerning the subject matter of this Action. Such Protected Material may be

5 disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this

6 Order. When the Action has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with

7 the provisions of Section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

8 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a

9 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons

10 authorized under this Order.

11 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless

12 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a

13 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated

14 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

15 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well

16 as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary

17 to disclose the information for this litigation;

18 (b) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party (including

19 House Counsel) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;

20 (c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably

21 necessary for this Action, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

22 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in

23 paragraph 7.4(a), below, have been followed, and their staff to whom disclosure is

24 reasonably necessary for this Action and who are supervised by Experts who have

25 signed the Exhibit A;

26 (d) the Court and its personnel;

27 (e) court reporters and their staff;

1 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional

2 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have

3 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

4 (g) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,

5 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions;

6 (h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

7 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; and

8 (i) any Party to this Action.

9 7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

10 ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in

11 writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or

12 item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only

13 to:

14 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well

15 as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary

16 to disclose the information for this litigation;

17 (b) up to three House counsel for each entity, who are not actively

18 involved in and do not provide patent prosecution assistance to others who are

19 actively involved in prosecuting patents concerning the subject matter of this action,

20 identified below:

21 • For Plaintiffs Agensys, Inc. and Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Brian

22 Anderson and Chika Seidel.

23 • For Defendant Hans David Ulmert: Angus MacDonald, Kimberly

24 Robinson, and Jerome Mayer-Cantu.

25 (c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably

26 necessary for this Action, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

27 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in

1 paragraph 7.4(a), below, have been followed, and their staff to whom disclosure is

2 reasonably necessary for this Action and who are supervised by Experts who have

3 signed the Exhibit A;

4 (d) the Court and its personnel;

5 (e) court reporters and their staff;

6 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional

7 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have

8 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

9 (g) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,

10 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions;

11 (h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

12 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; and

13 (i) Defendant Hans David Ulmert and/or Defendant Norbert Peekhaus, to

14 the extent that Plaintiffs contend that the information designated as “HIGHLY

15 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” consists of a trade secret that

16 was misappropriated by the individual Defendant to whom disclosure is made.

17 7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY

18 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to

19 Experts.

20 (a) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the

21 Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this

22 Order) any information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY

23 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(c)

24 first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) identifies the

25 general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

26 information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert,

27 (2) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary

1 residence, (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the

2 Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the

3 Expert has received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of

4 expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, including in

5 connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years, 1 and (6)

6 identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any

7 litigation in connection with which the Expert has offered expert testimony,

8 including through a declaration, report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during

9 the preceding five years.

10 (b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in

11 the preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to

12 the identified Expert unless, within 5 business days of delivering the request, the

13 Party receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection

14 must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is based.

15 (c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer

16 with the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve

17 the matter by agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement

18 is reached, the Party seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert will initiate the

19 dispute resolution process (and, if necessary, file a discovery motion) under Local

20 Rule 37-1 et seq.

21 In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert shall bear

22 the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail (under

23 the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the

24

25

1 If the Expert believes any of this information is subject to a confidentiality

26 obligation to a third-party, then the Expert should provide whatever information the

Expert believes can be disclosed without violating any confidentiality agreements,

27

and the Party seeking to disclose to the Expert shall be available to meet and confer

1 Protected Material to its Expert.

2 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED

3 IN OTHER LITIGATION

4 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation

5 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as

6 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

7 ONLY,” that Party must:

8 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification

9 will include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

10 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order

11 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the

12 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification will include

13 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

14 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be

15 pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

16 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with

17 the subpoena or court order will not produce any information designated in this

18 Action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

19 EYES ONLY” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or

20 order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The

21 Designating Party will bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that

22 court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed

23 as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful

24 directive from another court.

25 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE

26 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION

27

1 (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a

2 Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

3 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by

4 Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief

5 provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as

6 prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

7 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to

8 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is

9 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s

10 confidential information, then the Party will:

11 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

12 that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality

13 agreement with a Non-Party;

14 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

15 Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably

16 specific description of the information requested; and

17 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the

18 Non-Party, if requested.

19 (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within

20 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party

21 may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery

22 request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party will

23 not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the

24 confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.

25 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party will bear the burden and expense

26 of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

27 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

1 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed

2 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this

3 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in

4 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts

5 to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or

6 persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order,

7 and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and

8 Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE

10 PROTECTED MATERIAL

11 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain

12 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection,

13 the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil

14 Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar

15 as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or

16 information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the

17 parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted

18 to the court.

19 12. MISCELLANEOUS

20 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any

21 person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

22 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this

23 Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to

24 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this

25 Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any

26 ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.

27

1 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

2 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may

3 only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the

4 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material

5 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information

6 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.

7 12.4 Use of Protected Material at a Public Hearing. If a Party anticipates

8 use or disclosure of Protected Material at any public court hearing, the Party seeking

9 to use such material shall provide notice to the Designating Party before or at the

10 hearing but before referencing the material at the hearing. The Designating Party

11 may object to the use of the material. The Court may apply restrictions, as it deems

12 appropriate, on the matter of use of such Protected Material, and on public access to

13 such materials.

14 12.5 Use of Protected Material at Trial. The Parties agree to meet and

15 confer on a protocol regarding the use or disclosure of Protected Material at trial in

16 connection with the final pretrial order in this case, if any. To the extent the Parties

17 cannot reach agreement on such a protocol, the Designating Party shall file a motion

18 with the Court seeking an order to seal the portions of the trial record in which the

19 Protected Materials were used.

20 12.6 Violations. Any willful violation of this Order may be punished by civil

21 or criminal contempt proceedings, financial or evidentiary sanctions, reference to

22 disciplinary authorities, or other appropriate action at the discretion of the Court.

23 13. FINAL DISPOSITION

24 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in Section 4, within 60

25 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return

26 all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in

27 this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations,

1 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

2 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving

3 Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same

4 person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) affirms

5 that all the Protected Material was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the

6 Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or

7 any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material.

8 Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all

9 pleadings, motion papers, written discovery requests and responses, trial, deposition,

10 and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence between the parties,

11 deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant

12 and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any

13 such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to

14 this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

15 ///

16 ///

17 ///

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

2 DATED: November 15, 2024

3

4

/s/ Randall E. Kay__________ /s/ David J. Tsai_________________

5

Randall E. Kay (SBN 149369) Carolyn S. Toto (SBN 233825)

6 rekay@jonesday.com carolyn.toto@pillsburylaw.com

JONES DAY Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

7

4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 725 South Figueroa Street, 36th Floor

8 San Diego, CA 92121 Los Angeles, CA 90017

Telephone: +1.858.314.1200 Telephone: 213.488.7100

9

10 Andrea W. Jeffries (SBN 183408) David J. Tsai (SBN 244479)

ajeffries@jonesday.com david.tsai@pillsburylaw.com

11

JONES DAY Alekzandir Morton (SBN 319241)

12 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor alekzandir.morton@pillsburylaw.com

Los Angeles, CA 90071 John Steger (SBN 341299)

13

Telephone: +1.213.489.3939 john.steger@pillsburylaw.com

14 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Sarah A. Geers (Admitted Pro Hac Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor

15

Vice) San Francisco, CA 94111-5998

16 sgeers@jonesday.com Telephone: 415.983.1000

JONES DAY

17

250 Vesey Street Attorneys for Defendant Hans David

18 New York, NY 10281 Ulmert

Telephone: +1.212.326.3936

19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Agensys, Inc.

20 and Astellas Pharma, Inc. /s/ John J. Manier_______________

21

John J. Manier

22 jmanier@brgslaw.com

Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savit, LLP

23

15760 Ventura Blvd., 18th Floor

Encino, CA 91436

24 Tel.: 818-508-3700

25 Attorney for Defendant Norbert

Peekhaus

26

27

1 Pursuant to L.R. 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), the filing attorney attests all other signatories

2 || listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and

3 || have authorized it.

4 /s/ David J. Tsai

5

6 || FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

8 .

9 || DATED: November 18, 2024 Palace Lnakoe_

10 United States Magistrate Judge

1]

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

21

1 EXHIBIT A

2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3 I, _____________________________ [full name], of

4 ________________________________________________________________

5 [full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and

6 understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States

7 District Court for the Central District of California on ___________________[date]

8 in the case of Agensys, Inc., et al. v. Hans David Ulmert,. et al., No. 2:24-cv-03961-

9 JFW (PDx) (C.D. Cal.). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of

10 this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so

11 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I

12 solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that

13 is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict

14 compliance with the provisions of this Order.

15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court

16 for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this

17 Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after

18 termination of this action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [full

19 name] of ___________________________________________________________

20 [full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process

21 in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this

22 Stipulated Protective Order.

23 Date: ______________________________________

24 City and State where signed: _________________________________

25

26 Printed name: _______________________________

27 Signature: __________________________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.