Opinion

DUVERGER, TONI v. SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

  • 2024 TN WC 79
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Baker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Nov 12, 2024

12:03 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

TONI DUVERGER, ) Docket No. 2024-60-4531

Employee, )

v. )

SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, ) State File No. 29538-2024

INC., )

Employer, )

And )

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & ) Judge Joshua D. Baker

INDEMNITY CO. )

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

(DECISION ON THE RECORD)

Ms. Duverger requested a decision based on a review of the record without an

evidentiary hearing, seeking medical treatment from an orthopedist. Shoals Technologies

contends Ms. Duverger is not entitled to medical treatment because a nurse practitioner

believes her injury is preexisting and unrelated to employment.

Because a nurse practitioner is not qualified to testify on medical causation and Ms.

Duverger presented expert medical opinion to show she suffered a work injury requiring

medical treatment from an orthopedist, the Court holds Ms. Duverger is likely to prevail

on her request at a final hearing. Shoals Technologies must offer her a panel of orthopedists

for evaluation and treatment of her work injury.

Claim History

On April 22, 2024, Ms. Duverger injured her right shoulder while “changing out

heavy coils” for Shoals Technologies. She selected a walk-in clinic from a panel. At the

clinic, she told the nurse practitioner she developed right-shoulder pain after work because

she struggled “pulling and maneuvering 350lbs spools of cable all day.”

When conservative treatment did not improve her symptoms, Ms. Duverger had an

MRI that showed a strain and a shallow partial-thickness tear. After seeing the MRI results,

the nurse practitioner said the “infraspinatus myotendinous junction strain” is work-related

but “all other findings are pre-existing.”

Only the nurse’s electronic signature appears in the record, but he wrote that he

reviewed Ms. Duverger’s MRI results and discussed the “ongoing treatment plan and their

compliance and progression toward their goals” with Dr. Hilarion Wornonzoff-Dashkoff.

When Ms. Duverger disagreed with the nurse’s opinion, the nurse insisted she

follow up “with private ortho for outside expert opinion[,]” saying her condition did not

warrant an orthopedic referral.

With no referral, Ms. Duverger saw orthopedist Dr. Gregg Motz on her own and

gave him the same account of her work accident. She also told him her right-shoulder pain

is “constant,” “sharp,” and is “9/10 in intensity[.]”

After reviewing the MRI, Dr. Motz concluded the partial tear “may well be a small

full-thickness tear.” He continued, “It is unclear to me why this patient had her work comp

case closed. This is clearly a work caused problem[,] and she very likely requires a rotator

cuff repair.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Duverger must prove she would likely prevail at a final hearing on her requested

benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human

Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). She

requested medical treatment for her right-shoulder injury from an orthopedist. The Court

holds Shoals Technologies must provide this treatment.

Shoals Technologies asserted Ms. Duverger’s condition is not work-related because

her authorized treating physician provided an opinion that causation does not exist and

recommended that she treat independently, outside the system of workers’ compensation.

The Court disagrees.

An employer “shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and

surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-

6-204(a)(1)(A). An injured worker is not required to prove her diagnosis or medical

causation to obtain an examination, where she has expressed a need for medical care after

a work injury. Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at

*9-10 (Aug. 25, 2021).

2

Ms. Duverger submitted expert medical opinion from an orthopedist that she

“clearly [has] a work caused problem and . . . very likely requires a rotator cuff repair.”

Moreover, Dr. Motz’s opinion is the only competent one in evidence, as the Court cannot

rely on a nurse’s causation opinion. Dorsey v. Amazon, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 13, at *9-10 (May 14, 2015). While the nurse wrote that he discussed Ms.

Duverger’s MRI results and treatment progress with the doctor, that discussion does not

eliminate the requirement that a doctor give the actual causation opinion.

Given Dr. Motz’s opinion, Ms. Duverger is likely to prevail at a final hearing in

proving that an orthopedist is necessary to evaluate and treat her work injury and orders

Shoals Technologies to provide her a panel of orthopedists. See Smith v. Galloway Constr.,

Inc., 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 70, at *12-13 (Oct. 28, 2019) (trial judge may

exercise discretion to order treatment with a specialist when the evidence suggests the area

of specialty is appropriate).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Shoals Technologies shall offer Ms. Duverger a panel of orthopedists for her to

select an authorized treating physician for evaluation and treatment if necessary.

2. A status hearing is set for January 7, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. You must

call 615-741-2113 or 855-874-0474 to participate.

3. Unless an interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance

with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry

of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The

Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by

email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day

after entry of this Order. Failure to submit confirmation within seven business days

may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding

compliance, contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED November 12, 2024.

________________________________________

JUDGE JOSHUA D. BAKER

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

Appendix

Exhibits

1. Rule 72 Declaration of Toni Duverger

2. Choice of Physicians form signed April 24, 2024

3. Medical records from Concentra dated April 24 to June 12, 2024

4. Rayus Radiology MRI report dated May 17, 2024

5. Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics record signed by Dr. Greg Motz on July 3, 2024

6. Work Status Report signed by Dr. Greg Motz on July 3, 2024

7. TriStar Medical Group form dated June 26, 2024

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy was sent as indicated on November 12, 2024.

Name Mail Fax Email Address

Adam Brock-Dagnan, X adam.brockdagnan@forthepeople.com

Employee’s Attorney christopher.howell@forthepeople.com

Alyssa Minge, X Alyssa.minge@thehartford.com

Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________________

Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.