“Documents falling into categories commonly sealed are those containing trade secrets, confidential research and development information, marketing plans, revenue information, pricing information, and the hke.”’
How later courts described this case
- “Documents falling into categories commonly sealed are those containing trade secrets, confidential research and development information, marketing plans, revenue information, pricing information, and the hke.”’
- “[t]he privacy interests of innocent third parties . .. should weigh heavily in a court’s balancing equation.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
[) DOC #:
DATE FILED:__7/10/2024 □□□
DICELLO LEVITT
VIA ECF
Having found, for the reasons set forth by the EPPs, that a valid
Hon. Stewart D. Aaron basis exists for sealing the selected paragraphs, the motion to
Daniel Patrick Moynthan seal is GRANTED. SO ORDERED.
United States Courthouse Dated: July 10, 2024
500 Pearl St. Aer SF A~_
New York, NY 10007
Re: In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation, No. 18-cv-4361-AKH (S.D.N.Y.)
Dear Magistrate Judge Aaron,
Pursuant to Rule HI(E) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules of Practice, we write on behalf of
End-Payor Plaintiffs (“EPPs”) requesting permission to file certain paragraphs outlined below in the
Declaration of Rebecca J. Evans of Angeion Group LLC Re: Fraud Detection, Deficiency Process,
& Distribution (the “Angeion Declaration’) under seal.
“Notwithstanding the presumption of public access to judicial records, courts may deny
access to records that are ‘sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s or non-party’s
competitive standing.” See In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 258 F.R.D. 236, 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting
Nixon v. Warner Comme’ns, Ine, 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)); see also Cumberland Packing Corp. v. Monstanto
Co., 184 F.R.D. 504, 506 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (“Documents falling into categories commonly sealed are
those containing trade secrets, confidential research and development information, marketing plans,
revenue information, pricing information, and the hke.”’).
As this court recognized during the hearing on June 14, 2024, non-parties have a strong
interest in not having their materials be freely disclosed to the public when the specifically requested
material is produced in litigation to be kept confidential. See, ¢.g., United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d
1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[t]he privacy interests of innocent third parties . .. should weigh
heavily in a court’s balancing equation.”) (quoting Gardner v. Newsday, Inc. (In re Newsday, Inc.), 895
F.2d 74, 79-80 (2d Cir. 1990)); see also In re Savitt/ Adler Litig,, 1997 WL 797511, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Aug.
5, 2003) (nonparties’ privacy interests comprise a “strong factor weighing against disclosure of their
identities”’).
Here, Angeion, a non-party, specifically requests in its Declaration that “the Court allow for
the redaction of the paragraphs in the . . . section entitled ‘Fraudulent Claim Filing’ (paras. 19-28), as
specific details regarding our anti-fraud efforts are discussed and, if disclosed, will undermine our
ability to combat fraudulent claim submissions by providing insight into the methods and techniques
employed by Angeion.” See Angeion Declaration at 418. In addition, those same paragraphs contain
proprietary details pertaining to AngeionAffirm, Angeion’s proprietary fraud detection system, that
are competitively sensitive and, if made publicly available, will be detrimental to Angeion’s business
in the marketplace. Alternatively, Angeion respectfully requests that the entire Angeion Declaration
| Page 2 of 2
be filed under seal. Id.
For these reasons, EPPs respectfully request that portions of the Angeion Declaration —
specifically paragraphs 19-28 — remain under seal. A redacted version will be filed on the docket.
EPPs and Angeion are available at the Court’s convenience should Your Honor have any questions.
Dated: July 8, 2024
Sincerely,
[s/ Gregory S. Asciolla