Opinion

Cruz v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yok

Court
District Court, E.D. New York
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.6%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------- X

:

KIMBERLY CRUZ,

:

Plaintiff,

: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

– against – :

24-CV-3153 (AMD) (LB)

:

BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF

:

NEW YORK, et al.,

:

Defendants.

:

--------------------------------------------------------------- X

ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge:

On April 26, 2024, the plaintiff filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. (ECF No. 1.) The

plaintiff paid the filing fee to commence this action and is therefore responsible for serving the

defendants with process. On May 3, 2024, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom directed the plaintiff to

serve the defendants and file proof of proper service with the Court by July 24, 2024, pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 6.) Judge Bloom cautioned the plaintiff that

she would recommend that the Court dismiss the action without prejudice if the plaintiff did not

serve the defendants by the deadline or otherwise show good cause why she did not timely serve

the defendants. (Id. at 1.) To date, the plaintiff has not filed proof of service, nor has she shown

good cause why she has not served the defendants. On August 8, 2024, Judge Bloom issued a

sua sponte report and recommendation in which she recommended that the Court dismiss this

action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 7.) No party has filed an objection to

the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has passed.

A district court reviewing a report and recommendation “may accept, reject, or modify, in

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C). To accept a report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been

made, “a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the

record.” VOX Amplification Ltd. v. Meussdorffer, 50 F. Supp. 3d 355, 369 (E.D.N.Y. 2014).

I have carefully reviewed Judge Bloom’s report and recommendation for clear error and

find none. Accordingly, I adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety. The plaintiff’s

complaint is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully

directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

s/Ann M. Donnelly

___________________________

ANN M. DONNELLY

United States District Judge

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

August 27, 2024

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.