The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
1] Skyler R. Brown, No. 2:20-cev-01913-KJM-JDP
12 Plaintiff, ORDER
13 v.
John Deandra, et al.,
1S Defendants.
16
17 In October 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be
18 | dismissed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 32.
19 | Plaintiff has not responded. In light of the public interest in expeditious resolution of litigation,
20 | the court’s need to manage its docket, the lack of any apparent prejudice to the defense, and the
21 | lack of any other effective sanction, this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of
22 | prosecution. See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing
23 | Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)).
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 DATED: August 12, 2024. / /
26
CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE