Opinion

Walter Lee Cole v. B. Cates

Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
Sep 16, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.2%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 WALTER LEE COLE, ) Case No. 22-cv-00695-JVS-JC

)

12 )

Petitioner, )

13 ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. ) CONCLUSIONS, AND

14 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF

RON BROOMFIELD, ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

15 ) JUDGE

)

16 Respondent. )

___________________________________

17

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of

19 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

20 (“Petition”), the parties’ submissions in connection with Petitioner’s “Notice for

21 Court to Take Judicial Notice of Petitioner” (“Request for Judicial Notice”) and

22 Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition (“Motion to Dismiss”), and all of the

23 records herein, including the July 3, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United

24 States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”) and Petitioner’s filings

25 of August 26, 2024, which are construed as his objections to the Report and

26 Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court approves and accepts the Report and

27 Recommendation. The Court has further made a de novo determination of those

28 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The

1 || Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of

2 || the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections, which raise the

3 || same contentions previously raised in Petitioner’s opposition to the Motion to

4 || Dismiss.!

5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Request for Judicial Notice is granted in

6 || part and denied in part (see Report and Recommendation at 2-3 n.2), the Motion to

7 || Dismiss is granted and the Petition and this action are dismissed.

8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the

9 || Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel

10 || for Respondent.

1] LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

12

13 | DATED: September 16, 2024 [ya

14 ewe UV, [eo -

15 v /

16 HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 'To the extent the Objections request that the Court take judicial notice of Brown v.

27 || Atchley, 76 F.4th 862 (9th Cir. 2023), or other public documents properly subject to judicial

notice, such request is granted, and the Court has taken into account the documents referenced

28 || and/or attached to the Objections.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.