Opinion

Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom

  • 358 U.S. 99
  • 43 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137
  • 79 S. Ct. 150
  • 3 L. Ed. 2d 143
  • 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1794
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Nov 24, 1958
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
38 cases
Authority
More cited than 97.5%

Board’s refusal to exercise jurisdiction over hotel industry fails to comport with standards approved in Office Employes Int’l Union v. NLRB, 353 U.S. at 318-20, 77 S.Ct. at 802-03

How later courts described this case

  • Board’s refusal to exercise jurisdiction over hotel industry fails to comport with standards approved in Office Employes Int’l Union v. NLRB, 353 U.S. at 318-20, 77 S.Ct. at 802-03

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board’s "long standing policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry” as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in

Office Employes

v.

Labor Board,

353 U. S. 313, 318-320 (1957). The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.