Opinion

State of Tennessee v. Franklin Darnell Brown, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Filed
Sep 16, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.5%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

Assigned on Briefs August 3, 2004

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FRANKLIN DARNELL BROWN, JR.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County

Nos. 02CR-1945 C. Creed McGinley, Judge

No. W2003-01863-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 16, 2004

THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority opinion that application of enhancement factor (14) violates the

ruling in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. _____, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004). However, I would remand

for a new sentencing hearing for the trial court to use the only applicable enhancement factor, the

Defendant’s prior convictions. While the trial court did state that the prior convictions “should be

considered very strongly as far as enhancement,” the trial court then immediately stated that

Defendant had to be on probation at the time of the offense which is the subject of this appeal, and

the trial court applied that enhancement factor also.

Compliance with Blakely may cause some inconvenience for a relatively brief period of time.

However, the United States Supreme Court in Blakely clearly set forth the importance of a jury

determination of any enhancement factor, with the exception of prior convictions. The result may

be the same upon remand and resentencing. However, the Defendant is entitled to be sentenced by

the trial court with the clear understanding that only one enhancement factor, prior convictions, can

be used to enhance the sentence. Since using an enhancement factor in violation of Blakely is a

violation of “a fundamental reservation of power in our constitutional structure,” Blakely, 124 S.Ct.

at 2538-39, and not merely the erroneous application of an inapplicable enhancement factor, I am

reluctant to, in effect, resentence the Defendant to the maximum sentence based upon only one

enhancement factor. There is no way to know, from this record, that the trial court would definitely

have given the maximum sentence without applying enhancement factor (14). Therefore, I would

remand for a resentencing.

___________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.