Opinion

Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions

Court
District Court, N.D. Texas
Filed
Oct 18, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

LONNIE KADE WELSH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CORRECT CARE RECOVERY )

SOLUTIONS, et al., )

)

Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 5:18-CV-020-C-BQ

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge (ECF No. 195) therein advising the Court that: (1) Welsh’s motion to file supplemental

evidence (ECF No. 182) should be denied; (2) Defendant Ross Hester’s Motion to Strike (ECF

No. 190) should be granted and Welsh’s Sur-Reply (ECF No. 189) should be stricken; and (3)

Defendant Hester’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of qualified immunity (ECF No.

173) should be granted. Plaintiff filed his Objections on October 17, 2022.

The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or

specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the

subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that

Petitioner’s objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an

independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings and conclusions contained in the Report and

Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to File

Supplemental Evidence is DENIED; (2) Defendant Hester’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED and

Plaintiff's Sur-reply is STRICKEN; and (3) Defendant Hester’s Motion for Summary Judgment

on the Issue of Qualified Immunity is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims against Defendant

Hester in his individual capacity are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated October 18, 2022.

SENIOR UNITEDSTATES DISTRICV JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.