Opinion

United States v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

Court
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Filed
Dec 8, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.6%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No.: 1:23-CV-258-TAV-CHS

)

CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, )

TENNESSEE, )

)

Defendant. )

CONSENT DECREE

The United States of America alleges as follows:

I. BACKGROUND

1. The United States brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief,

monetary damages, and a civil penalty against the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee (the

“City” or the “Defendant”), under the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1968, as amended (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601–3631, and Title II of the

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.

§§ 12131–12134, and Title II’s implementing regulation, 28 C.F.R. Part 35. The

complaint alleges that the City discriminated on the basis of disability1 by refusing to

1 Although the FHA uses the term “handicap” instead of “disability,” the words have the

same legal meaning. See Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, 631 (1998). These equivalent terms

refer to the definitions included in the Fair Housing Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h); 24 C.F.R.

§ 100.201; and in the Americans with Disabilities Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 12102(1); 28 C.F.R.

§ 35.104.

allow four people with mental disabilities to reside together in a single-family home in

the City under the same terms and conditions as residents without disabilities. The United

States alleges that through its actions and implementation of its zoning ordinance, the

City is alleged to have engaged in a discriminatory housing practice and denied rights

granted by the FHA and the ADA, and such denial raises an issue of general public

importance.

2. As described in the United States’ Complaint, this case concerns the efforts

of Quality Lifestyle Service, Inc. (“Quality Lifestyle”), a registered Tennessee 501(c)(3)

non-profit corporation, beginning in June 2020 to provide housing (through a “Housing

Initiative” or “Initiative”) to four unrelated persons with mental illness who would have

lived together at 1104 South Greenwood Avenue, a four-bedroom home in an R-1 zoning

district in the City (“subject property”). Tennessee law, Tenn. Code Ann.

§§ 13 24 101–104, removes zoning obstacles preventing persons with mental and physical

disabilities from obtaining equal access to housing in Tennessee. Tenn. Code Ann.

§ 13-24-103 states that this law “takes precedence over any provision in any zoning law or

ordinance in Tennessee to the contrary.” The City Zoning Ordinance defines single-family

residences to include any home in which eight (8) or fewer unrelated persons with

disabilities reside and may include three (3) additional persons acting as support staff or

guardians, who need not be related to each other in a single-family zoned property pursuant

to Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-24-102.

2

3. Ursula Edwards is the Chief Executive Officer and owner of Quality

Lifestyle, which provides property management services to support housing for persons

with disabilities. During relevant times, a private person that was not a nonprofit entity

owned the subject property and Quality Lifestyle Services was operating under a lease

agreement for the subject property to provide property management services in conjunction

with the Mental Health Cooperative of Chattanooga and Blue Cross Blue Shield of

Tennessee.

4. The Initiative was a collaboration among a number of community

stakeholders, including the Hamilton County FUSE program, who sought to provide

housing to persons with disabilities in the City.

5. As described in the United States’ Complaint, it is alleged that the City took

steps, including imposing the requirements that Quality Lifestyle obtain a special permit,

that thwarted Quality Lifestyle’s efforts to provide housing for persons with disabilities

through the Initiative. As a result, Ms. Edwards and the Housing Initiative participants

were unable to provide housing to persons with disabilities at the subject property.

6. Regarding the FHA, the United States alleges that the City’s actions

described above constitute violations of the FHA §§ 3601-3619; a denial of rights to a

group of persons that raises an issue of general public importance, in violation of the Fair

Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3614(a); and a discriminatory housing practice involving the

legality of a state or local zoning or other land use law or ordinance, in violation of 42

U.S.C. § 3614(b).

3

7. Regarding the ADA, the United States alleges that the City’s actions

described above constitute discrimination in violation of Title II of the ADA, 42 U.S.C.

§ 12132, and its implementing regulation, 28 C.F.R. Part 35; and interfere with an

individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or

enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the

exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by the ADA, in violation of Title

V of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b).

8. The City has denied that it discriminated against Quality Lifestyle in that the

City initially determined that the proposal did not meet the safe harbor of Tenn. Code Ann.

§ 13-21-101. As a result, the special permit for operation of a group home was denied

during a hearing on November 4, 2020. Although the City refused to allow Quality

Lifestyle to open and operate the home at the subject property, it has allowed residences

for persons with disabilities managed by Quality Lifestyle to operate in other locations in

the City.

9. This Consent Decree (the “Decree”) is intended to effectuate a

comprehensive settlement of the United States’ claims. To avoid litigation, the United

States and the City (collectively, the “Parties”) have jointly and voluntarily agreed to

resolve the United States’ claims, as indicated by the signatures below. By entering into

this Decree, the City does not admit that it violated the FHA or the ADA. This Decree is

not an adverse finding, ruling, proceeding, or judgment against the City.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

4

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

10. The Parties agree that this Court has jurisdiction over this action and may

grant the relief sought herein under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345; 42 U.S.C. § 3614(a); 42

U.S.C. § 3614(b); 42 U.S.C. §§ 12133 and 12134; and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.

11. The Parties agree that venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because the

events or omissions giving rise to the claims alleged herein occurred in the Eastern District

of Tennessee and because the Defendant and the property at issue in this action are located

there.

III. EFFECTIVE DATE

12. The “effective date of the Decree” is the date on which the Court enters this

Consent Decree.

IV. GENERAL INJUNCTIONS AND NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS

13. When used in this Decree, the terms “Defendant” and “City” include the City

of City of Chattanooga, the Chattanooga Zoning Board of Appeals, the City’s employees,

elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, successors, and persons or entities acting

in concert or participation with them.

14. The City, its agents, employees, successors, and all persons in active concert

or participation with it, shall not:

a. Discriminate in the sale or rental, or otherwise make unavailable or

deny, a dwelling to any person because of a disability of that person,

of any person residing in or intending to reside in a dwelling, or any

5

person associated with such person;

b. Discriminate in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of

a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection

therewith, on the basis of disability;

c. Adopt, maintain, enforce, or implement any zoning or land use laws,

regulations, policies, procedures, or practices that discriminate on the

basis of disability;

d. Refuse to make reasonable accommodation2 in rules, policies,

practices, or services when such accommodation may be necessary to

afford a person or persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use

and enjoy a dwelling;

e. Coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with or retaliate against

persons with disabilities in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account

of such persons having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of having

aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of,

any right granted or protected by the FHA or the ADA;

f. Exclude persons with disabilities from participation in or deny the

2 In this Decree, “reasonable accommodation” refers to accommodations in rules, policies,

practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford a person with a

disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling, within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.

§ 3604(f); and “reasonable modifications” as used in the implementing regulation for Title II of

the ADA at 28 C.F.R. § 25.130(b)(7).

6

benefits of the City’s services, programs, or activities; or

g. Discriminate on the basis of disability on the face of its regulations;

or in making land use decisions regarding, or plans to create, operate,

or modify, programs, activities, or facilities that provide services for

individuals with disabilities. Such non-discrimination includes

making reasonable modifications to policies, practices, or procedures

when such modifications are necessary to afford individuals with

disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a facility, unless

such modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the land

use.

V. SPECIFIC INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

15. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the Decree, the City will submit

proposed amendments to its zoning ordinance as required by this Decree to the United

States for approval. The United States will not unreasonably delay or deny approval.

Within sixty (60) days of receiving the United States’ written approval of those

amendments, the City will enact as ordinances the approved policies and provisions, and

will administer related procedures. The amended zoning ordinance and related procedures

shall require explicitly that:

a. persons with disabilities shall not be denied housing opportunities

on the basis of disability, nor shall they be excluded from participation in or denied

the benefits of, the City’s services, programs, or activities, or otherwise be subjected

7

to discrimination through the administration of the City’s land development or

zoning practices;

b. housing providers for persons with disabilities seeking approval

for uses allowed by right under Tennessee state law and/or local land use or zoning

laws are not subjected to needless or unduly burdensome administrative hurdles,

including the requirement to obtain special use permits or other approvals;

c. all residences comprised of related or unrelated persons with

disabilities shall operate as of right in all residential zoning districts in the City to

the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as residences comprised

of non-disabled persons;

d. the provisions required by this Section shall protect residences that

house person(s) with disabilities regardless of whether they operate on a commercial

basis or on a non-profit basis;

e. related and/or unrelated persons with disabilities shall be included

in the City’s Zoning Ordinance definition of family to no lesser extent than

individuals without disabilities;

f. the protections afforded to housing for persons with disabilities

under Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-24-101-104 apply to all residences, whether temporary

or permanent, including transitional and other forms of supported housing; and

g. the provisions required by this Section shall protect persons with

disabilities who have mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or emotional

8

disabilities to the same extent that it protects persons with disabilities or conditions

other than mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or emotional disabilities.

16. Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the Decree, the City shall

amend the City’s Reasonable Accommodation Policy to clarify that the City’s

implementation of its zoning and land use ordinances, services, and programs are covered

by the Reasonable Accommodation Policy.

17. The City shall not limit the housing rights of people with disabilities or enact

ordinances that are inconsistent with this Decree, the FHA, or the ADA.

18. The City shall not otherwise modify its Zoning Regulations, Reasonable

Accommodation policy, or any other ordinance, rule, or policy during the term of this

Decree, in a manner such that the modification narrows, reduces, or limits the rights of

persons with disabilities.

19. Beginning within thirty (30) days of the United States’ approval of the City’s

revised Reasonable Accommodation Policy, and continuing throughout the duration of this

Decree, the Defendant shall continuously post and publicly display its revised Reasonable

Accommodation Policy on the City’s website and at the offices of the Defendant in which

announcements or vacancies are posted.

VI. MONETARY RELIEF

20. The Defendant shall pay the sum of Thirty Two Thousand Six Hundred and

00/100 dollars ($32,600.00) within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Decree by

sending a certified check or bank check to the attention of counsel for the United States,

9

payable to Quality Lifestyle Service, Inc., by overnight delivery to the street address to be

provided by the United States on or before the effective date of this Decree.

21. To receive this payment, Ms. Edwards must execute a release on behalf of

Quality Lifestyle, in the form of Attachment A signifying that the payment constitutes full

settlement of any claims the payee may have relating to the subject matter of this action.

Counsel for the United States shall obtain the signed release form and provide it to counsel

for the Defendant upon receipt of the check before tendering the check to Quality Lifestyle.

VII. CIVIL PENALTY

22. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Decree, the Defendant

shall pay Five Thousand and 00/100 dollars ($5,000.00) to the United States Treasury as a

civil penalty under 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(C)(i). The payment shall be in the form of an

electronic fund transfer pursuant to written instructions to be provided by the United States

on or before the effective date of this Decree.

23. In the event that the Defendant, its agents, or its employees engage in any

future violation(s) of the FHA, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction at the

request of the United States, against persons with disabilities or perceived disabilities

during the term of this Decree, such violation(s) shall constitute a “subsequent violation”

under 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(C)(ii).

VIII. RECORD-KEEPING & REPORTING

24. The Defendant shall continue to keep written records of each disability-based

request for reasonable accommodation it receives relating to housing until the dismissal of

10

this Decree as set forth in Paragraph 32. These records shall include: (A) the name, address,

and telephone number of the person or entity making the request; (B) the date on which the

request was received; (C) the nature of the request; (D) whether the request was granted or

denied; (E) if the request was denied, all documents showing or discussing the reason(s)

for the denial; and (F) copies of all documents, including audio and video recordings

received or created by the City pertaining to each reasonable accommodation for housing

request and its disposition.

25. The Defendant shall send all documents, notices, and other communications

required by the Decree to be sent to the United States to: Chief, Housing and Civil

Enforcement Section, Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Justice, 950

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (4CON), Washington, D.C. 20530, Attn: DJ #175-70-160.

The Defendant shall send all documents, notices, and communications required by or

relating to this Decree during its term by regular United States mail and electronic mail to

lori.wagner@usdoj.gov.

26. The Defendant shall prepare semi-annual reports until the dismissal of this

Decree as set forth in Paragraph 32 in a format provided by the United States that detail

the actions it has taken to fulfill its obligations under the Decree. The Defendant shall

submit its first Compliance Report to the United States no later than six (6) months after

the effective date of the Decree, and subsequent reports every six (6) months thereafter, for

the duration of the Decree, except that the final report shall be delivered to the United States

no fewer than sixty (60) days prior to the date upon which the Decree is scheduled to expire.

11

27. The Defendant shall include the following information in the Compliance

Reports:

a. the name, address, and title of the employee or official serving as

the designated person referred to in Paragraph 31;

b. copies of the training certification and acknowledgment forms

signed since the last report;

c. copies of any written complaint received since the last report

alleging discrimination by Defendant with respect to any matter subject to the

injunctions in part III, above, including a description of any action taken in response

to the complaint and copies of all pertinent documents, such as a copy of the

complaint, any documents filed with the complaint, and any written response to the

complaint made by Defendant;

d. copies of each zoning, land-use, or building application or request

for reasonable accommodation related to housing for disabled persons (including

those for building permits, special exceptions, variances, or other uses not provided

for) for which Defendant has made a determination since it submitted the previous

report, indicating: (1) the date of the application; (2) the applicant’s name; (3) the

applicant’s current residential street address; (4) the street address of the proposed

housing; (5) the disposition of the application, including any appeals, indicating

reasons for that outcome; and (6) if a vote was taken, how each participant voted

and the date of the vote; and

12

e. all documents presented in support of oral testimony offered by any

member of the public at any hearing held with respect to each such application or

request referred to in Paragraph 27(d) above that is denied by Defendant.

28. The Defendant shall maintain all records relating to implementation of and

compliance with all provisions of the Decree, including, but not limited to, all records

related to zoning, land-use, or building applications or requests for reasonable

accommodation related to housing for disabled persons. The United States shall have the

opportunity to inspect and copy any records maintained as required by the Decree after

giving reasonable notice to the Defendant.

29. Nothing in this Decree shall be interpreted to require persons with disabilities

or providers of housing for persons with disabilities acting or operating in accordance with

applicable zoning, licensing, and/or land use laws and practices, to seek permission from

the Defendant to begin or continue such action or operation.

IX. FAIR HOUSING ACT AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

TRAINING

30. The Defendant shall, no later than ninety (90) days from the effective date of

the Decree, provide training in the requirements of the Decree, the Fair Housing Act, and

the Americans with Disabilities Act to: the members and staff of the Board of Zoning

Appeals; the Building Inspector and staff of the City’s Building Department; and the

members of the City Council and their respective staff who have direct or supervisory

authority in connection with building, zoning, and land use functions in the City. The

13

training required by this Section shall include information on the rights of all classes

protected under the Fair Housing Act and the ADA, including the rights of persons with

disabilities.

a. The training shall be conducted by a qualified third party, subject to the

approval of the United States. The trainer shall be unconnected to the Defendant or

its employees, officials, agents, or counsel, and any expenses associated with this

training shall be borne by the Defendant. The City shall provide the United States

with a curriculum vitae that describes the proposed trainer’s experience and skills

relating to Fair Housing Act and ADA training, and a detailed proposed outline of

the content of the training program, including proposed handouts and power point

slides, at least ten (10) business days before the training required by this Section for

its review and approval, which the United States shall not unreasonably deny.

b. As part of the training, each person trained shall be given a copy of the

Decree, the FHA, and the ADA.

c. The Defendant shall, no later than ten (10) days after training, provide to

the United States certifications executed by each person trained confirming his or

her attendance and date of training. The certifications shall be in the form of

Attachment B.

d. For each person commencing employment or service in any of the

positions listed in this part, the Defendant shall, no later than ten (10) days after

such commencement or service, give each such person a copy of the Decree and the

14

Fair Housing Act and shall obtain each such person’s signed certification

acknowledging that he or she has received and read the Decree and the Act. This

certification shall be in the form of Attachment C.

X. COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR(S)

31. No later than ten (10) days after the effective date of this Decree, the

Defendant shall designate an employee(s) or official(s) of the City of Chattanooga to

receive complaints against the City of alleged housing discrimination involving housing

for persons with disabilities, and to coordinate compliance with this Decree. The

designated person(s) shall maintain copies of the Decree, the HUD complaint form, and

the pamphlet entitled “Are You a Victim of Housing Discrimination?” (HUD official forms

903 and 903.1, respectively); continuously post these materials on the City’s website, and

make these materials freely available to anyone upon request and without charge, including

all persons making housing discrimination complaints to Defendant. The Defendant shall

notify the United States in writing of the name, address, and title of the designated person(s)

no later than ten (10) days after the effective date of the Decree.

XI. DURATION OF DECREE AND TERMINATION OF LEGAL ACTION

32. The Decree shall remain in effect for a period of three (3) years after its

effective date. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the duration of this Decree to enforce

the terms of the Decree, after which time the case shall be dismissed with prejudice. Prior

to the expiration of the Decree’s term, and upon reasonable notice to the Defendant, and

after good faith efforts among the parties to avoid seeking Court intervention, the United

15

States may move the Court to extend the duration of the Decree in the interests of justice,

or for other good cause, including on the basis that the Defendant has failed to comply with

a provision of the Decree.

33. The parties agree to work cooperatively with one another in good faith to

resolve informally any differences regarding interpretation of, and compliance with, the

Decree prior to bringing such matters to the Court for resolution. However, in the event of

a failure by Defendant to perform in a timely manner any act required by this Decree or

otherwise to act in violation of any provision thereof, the United States may move this

Court to impose any remedy authorized by law or equity, including, but not limited to, an

order requiring performance of such act or deeming such act to have been performed, and

an award of any damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees that may have been

occasioned by the violation or failure to perform.

34. The parties shall have the right to seek from the Court modifications of the

Decree, provided that any request for a modification has been preceded by good faith

negotiations between the parties. The parties may agree in writing to modify the deadlines

established by this Decree without Court approval.

XII. COSTS OF LITIGATION

35. Each party to this litigation will bear its own costs and attorney’s fees

associated with this litigation.

16

XIII. RELEASE OF LITIGATION HOLDS

36. To the extent that any party previously implemented a litigation hold to

preserve documents, electronically stored information, or things related to the matter

described above, the party is no longer required to maintain such a litigation hold. Nothing

in this Paragraph relieves either party of any other obligations imposed by this Decree.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

FOR THE UNITED STATES:

FRANCIS M. HAMILTON III KRISTEN CLARKE

United States Attorney Assistant Attorney General

Civil Rights Division

By: /s/ Ben D. Cunningham /s/ Lori K. Wagner

Assistant United States Attorney CARRIE PAGNUCCO

United States Attorney’s Office Chief, Housing and Civil

Eastern District of Tennessee Enforcement Section

800 Market Street, Ste. 211 MICHAEL S. MAURER

Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Deputy Chief

Phone: (865) 225-1662 LORI K. WAGNER

E-mail: Ben.Cunningham@usdoj.gov Trial Attorney

Housing and Civil Enforcement Section

Civil Rights Division

United States Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

Phone: (202) 305-3107

Fax: (202) 514-1116

E-mail: Lori.Wagner@usdoj.gov

17

FOR THE CITY OF CHATTANOOGA:

/s/ Phillip A. Noblett

PHILLIP A. NOBLETT

City Attorney

KATHRYN MCDONALD

Assistant City Attorney

City of Chattanooga

Office of the City Attorney

100 East 11th Street, Suite 200

Chattanooga, TN 37402

Phone: (423) 643-8250

Fax: (423) 643-8255

E-mail: pnoblett@chattanooga.gov

18

Attachment A

GENERAL RELEASE IN FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS

Relating to the Consent Decree

United States v. City of Chattanooga, TN, Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00258

filed , 2023

In consideration of the parties’ agreement to the terms of the Consent Decree entered

by the Court in United States v. City of Chattanooga, Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00258, and

the City of Chattanooga’s (“City’s”) payment of the sum of Thirty Two Thousand, Six

Hundred and 0/100 dollars ($32,600.00) to Quality Lifestyle Service, Inc, I, Ursula

Edwards, my heirs and assigns, hereby release the City and its successors, insurers, agents

and assigns, from any and all liability for any existing pending or potential claims or causes

of action, legal or equitable, that I or Quality Lifestyle Service, Inc. may have against the

City arising out of the allegations raised in this action or any related action or complaint

pending before HUD involving the City based on this Consent Decree.

It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is the compromise of a disputed

claim, that the payment made is not to be construed as an admission of liability on the part

of the party or parties hereby released. The parties further understand that this Agreement

does not include any payment for attorney’s fees or discretionary costs by the City, and all

parties waive any claim for attorney’s fees or discretionary costs, as part of this settlement

and compromise and release the City from such liability. I hereby acknowledge that I have

19

read and understand this release and have executed it voluntarily and with full knowledge

of its legal consequences.

In witness whereof, with the intent to be legally bound hereby, I have set my hand

and seal

this _____ day of _________, 2023.

_____________________________

Ursula D. Edwards

Chief Executive Officer

For Quality Lifestyle Service, Inc.

113 North Moore Road

Chattanooga, TN 37411

20

Attachment B

CERTIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE AT

FAIR HOUSING ACT &

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRAINING

On , I attended training on the Consent Decree entered by

the federal district court in United States v. City of Chattanooga, Civil No. 1:23-

cv-00258, (E.D. Tenn.) on the federal Fair Housing Act, and the Americans with

Disabilities Act. I have had all of my questions concerning the Consent Decree,

the Fair Housing Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act answered to my

satisfaction.

_____________________________

Signature

_____________________________

Print name

_____________________________

Job title

_____________________________

Date

21

Attachment C

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF COPIES OF

CONSENT DECREE

AND FAIR HOUSING ACT

On , I received copies of and have read the Consent Decree

entered by the federal district court in United States v. City of Chattanooga, Civil

No. 1:23-cv-00258 (E.D. Tenn.) on , and the federal

Fair Housing Act. I have had all of my questions concerning the Consent Decree

and the Fair Housing Act answered to my satisfaction.

_____________________________

Signature

_____________________________

Print name

_____________________________

Job title

_____________________________

Date

22

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.