Opinion

Craig v. McMillan

Court
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Filed
Jul 5, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.6%

The opinion

EUANSITTEERDN S DTAISTTERSI CDTIS OTFR TICETN CNOESUSRETE

AT KNOXVILLE

WILLIAM CRAIG, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:23-CV-148-JRG-DCP

)

GREGORY S. MCMILLAN, and MIRANDA )

MCCABE, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,

and Standing Order 13-02.

Now before the Court is an Amended Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of

Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 27]. Specifically, Circuit Court Judge

Gregory S. McMillian (“Judge McMillian”) moves for a stay of discovery, or alternatively, a

protective order, because he has filed a motion to dismiss based on the doctrine of absolute judicial

immunity, along with other defenses. He states that until this threshold determination is made,

discovery should not be permitted. Judge McMillian represents that “no party objects to this

motion to stay” [Doc. 27 p. 1 (emphasis omitted)].

Generally, when a party raises immunity as a defense, “a stay is mandated . . . unless there

is discovery needed to frame the immunity issue.” Brown v. Timmerman-Cooper, No. 2:10-CV-

283, 2012 WL 113528, at *4 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2012); see also M.F. v. Perry Cnty. Child. &

Fam. Servs., No. 2:15-CV-2731, 2016 WL 7403825, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 22, 2016) (“The Sixth

Circuit has explained that because judicial immunity is designed to protect judges ‘from the

burdens of discovery’ until the applicability of immunity is resolved, ‘the court is further obligated,

upon application, not only to refrain from proceeding to trial but to stay discovery until that issue

is decided.””) (quoting Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 299 (6th Cir. 1986)).

Given the guidance above, and because no party objects to the motion, the Court GRANTS

the Amended Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss and/or

Protective Order [Doc. 27]. Discovery against Judge McMillian SHALL be stayed pending

adjudication of his motion to dismiss [Doc. 15].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER: _

□ / eA a Ga. Tole ra

Debra C. Poplin WO

United States Magistrate Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.