Opinion

Herrera v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Court
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 28, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.2%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY E. HERRERA, :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-1946

Petitioner :

(JUDGE MANNION)

Vv. :

WARDEN ORZEN, :

Respondent :

JEFFREY E. HERRERA., :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-1947

Petitioner :

(JUDGE MANNION)

V. :

PA BD. OF PROB AND PAROLE, :

Respondent :

ORDER

In accordance with this Court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petitions for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) are DISMISSED.

2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c).'

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE these cases.

| 2S TTT

1 Jurists of reason would not debate the procedural or substantive

disposition of the Petitioner's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 ‘2()00). Therefore, no certificate of ajopezalability will be grartec. See id.

4. Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 15) is DISMISSED

as moot.

Jif E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATE: Aprilay 2023

22-1946-01

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.