Opinion

Brown v. Berryhill

Court
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 16, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.1%

explaining judges should give some review to every report and recommendation

How later courts described this case

  • explaining judges should give some review to every report and recommendation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAXAZINA BROWN, :

Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-1619

v. : (JUDGE MANNION)

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner :

of Social Security,

:

Defendant

:

O R D E R

Pending before the court is the report of Magistrate Judge Gerald B.

Cohn, which recommends that the decision of the Commissioner of Social

Security denying the plaintiff’s claim for Supplemental Security Income be

reversed and the action be remanded to the Commissioner for further

proceedings. (Doc. 29). No objections have been filed to the report and

recommendation. Upon review, the report will be adopted in its entirety.

In considering plaintiffs’ appeal in this matter, Judge Cohn has

determined that the plaintiff made a showing of clear prejudice or unfairness

at the administrative hearing that stemmed from her unrepresented status.

In addition, Judge Cohn determined that the ALJ erred in his reliance on the

residual functional capacity assessment of the single decision maker.

Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, the court

should, as a matter of good practice, Asatisfy itself that there is no clear error

on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.@ Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v.

Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D.Pa. 2010) (citing

Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987) (explaining judges

should give some review to every report and recommendation)).

Nevertheless, whether timely objections are made or not, the district court

may accept, not accept, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1);

Local Rule 72.31.

Upon review of Judge Cohn’s report and recommendation, the court

finds no clear error of record. Moreover, the court agrees with the sound

reasoning which led Judge Cohn to his conclusions. As such, the court will

adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The report and recommendation of Judge Cohn (Doc. 29) is

ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY as the decision of the court.

(2) The final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s

claims is REVERSED.

(3) The instant action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for

further proceedings.

(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

S/ Malachy E. Mannion

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATE: November 16, 2020

18-1619-02

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.