Opinion

BROWN v. OBERLANDER

Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
May 16, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEREMY BROWN, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

:

v. : NO. 19-3689

:

OBERLANDER, et al., :

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2022, upon careful and independent

consideration of the petition, response, and available state court records, and after

review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R.

Strawbridge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable

jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Chad F. Kenney

____________________________________

CHAD F. KENNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.