Opinion

PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 3, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAURICE M. PRICE, CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF NO. 19-5263

PROBATION AND PAROLE, THE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE

COUNTY OF AND THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of

the petition, amendments, response, and available state court records, there being no timely

objection filed by petitioner and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that

reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.

__

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.