BROWN v. PORRATA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BYRON M. BROWN, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-CV-3219

:

C/O L. PORRATA, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff Byron M.

Brown’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 9), his Prisoner Trust Fund Account

Statement (ECF No. 10), and his pro se Complaint and Exhibits (ECF Nos. 1, 5-8 & 11-12), it is

ORDERED that:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. Byron M. Brown, # 875390, shall pay the full filing fee of $350 in installments,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), regardless of the outcome of this case. The Court directs the

Warden of Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility or other appropriate official to assess an initial

filing fee of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to Brown’s inmate account;

or (b) the average monthly balance in Brown’s inmate account for the six-month period

immediately preceding the filing of this case. The Warden or other appropriate official shall

calculate, collect, and forward the initial payment assessed pursuant to this Order to the Court

with a reference to the docket number for this case. In each succeeding month when the amount

in Brown’s inmate trust fund account exceeds $10.00, the Warden or other appropriate official

shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court equaling 20% of the preceding month’s income

credited to Brown’s inmate account until the fees are paid. Each payment shall refer to the

docket number for this case.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND a copy of this Order to the Warden of

Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility.

4. The Complaint and Exhibits are DEEMED filed.

5. The Complaint and Exhibits are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the

reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum.

6. Brown may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this

Order. Any amended complaint must clearly identify all defendants in the caption of the

amended complaint in addition to identifying them in the body of the amended complaint and

shall state the basis for Brown’s claims against each defendant. Any amended complaint shall

also state the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction and shall state the relief Brown seeks from the

Court. The amended complaint shall be a single, complete document that does not rely on the

initial Complaint, Exhibits, or any other papers filed in this case to state a claim. When drafting

his amended complaint, Brown should be mindful of the Court’s reasons for dismissing his prior

filings as explained in the Court’s Memorandum. Upon the filing of an amended complaint, the

Clerk shall not make service until so ORDERED by the Court.

7. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Brown a blank copy of the Court’s

form complaint for a prisoner filing a civil rights action bearing the above civil action number.

Brown may use this form to file his amended complaint if he chooses to do so.1

8. If Brown does not wish to amend his Complaint, he may file a notice with the

Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order seeking entry of a final order, at which

time the Court will issue a final order dismissing the case. Any such notice shall include the

1 This form is available on the Court’s website at

http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/forms/frmc1983f.pdf.

civil action number for this case. See Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2019) (“If the

plaintiff does not desire to amend, he may file an appropriate notice with the district court

asserting his intent to stand on the complaint, at which time an order to dismiss the action would

be appropriate.” (quoting Borelli v. City of Reading, 532 F.2d 950, 951 n.1 (3d Cir. 1976))); In re

Westinghouse Sec. Litig., 90 F.3d 696, 703–04 (3d Cir. 1996) (holding “that the district court did

not abuse its discretion when it dismissed with prejudice the otherwise viable claims . . .

following plaintiffs’ decision not to replead those claims” when the district court “expressly

warned plaintiffs that failure to replead the remaining claims . . . would result in the dismissal of

those claims”).

9. If Brown fails to file any response to this Order, the Court will issue an order

dismissing this case. See Weber, 939 F.3d at 239-40 (explaining that a plaintiff’s intent to stand

on his complaint may be inferred from inaction after issuance of an order directing him to take

action to cure a defective complaint).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.