Opinion

Forter v. Brown

Court
District Court, D. Oregon
Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.8%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JEFFREY D. FORTER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. 6:21-cv-00478-SB

v.

OPINION AND ORDER

GOVERNOR KATE BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

MOSMAN, J.,

On September 26, 2023, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and

Recommendation (“F. & R.”) [ECF 185]. Judge Beckerman recommends that I grant

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF 158] and dismiss Plaintiffs’ Article I, Section 20 claim

under the Oregon Constitution with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ claim for class damages without

prejudice. Objections were due on October 10, 2023, but none were filed. I agree with Judge

Beckerman.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F. & R. to which no objections are addressed. See

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which J am required to review the F. & R.

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,

or modify any part of the F. & R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

CONCLUSION

Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation. | ADOPT her F. & R.

[ECF 185] as my own opinion, and ] GRANT Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF 158]. I

dismiss Plaintiffs’ Article I, Section 20 claim with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ claim for class

damages without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17 day of November, 2023.

Wechash U/ Wleaman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Senior United States District Judge

2 — OPINION AND ORDER

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.