The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
TREMAYNE OMAR SLATER, Case No. 3:21-cv-00229-SB
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING F&R
v.
KATE BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
IMMERGUT, District Judge.
On August, 10, 2023, Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and
Recommendation ("F&R"), ECF 36, recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF
32, be GRANTED. No party filed objections. This Court ADOPTS Judge Beckerman’s F&R.
STANDARDS
Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), as amended, the court may “accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). If a party objects to a magistrate judge’s F&R, “the court shall make a
de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or
recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. But the court is not required to review, de
novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the F&R to which no
objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Nevertheless, the Act “does not
preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte” whether de novo or under another
standard. Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.
CONCLUSION
No party having filed objections, this Court has reviewed the F&R, ECF 36, and accepts
Judge Beckerman's conclusions. Judge Beckerman's F&R, ECF 36, is adopted in full.
Accordingly, this Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 32.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 5th day of September, 2023.
/s/ Karin J. Immergut
Karin J. Immergut
United States District Judge