Opinion

Stafford v. Tinker Federal Credit Union

Court
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.6%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

SHAKIRA STAFFORD, on behalf of )

herself and all others similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. CIV-23-00089-JD

)

TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The Court has an independent obligation to determine its subject matter

jurisdiction. Upon review of the record, the Court’s jurisdiction is unclear. The Court

calls for the parties to brief this issue. Specifically, the parties should brief whether

Plaintiff’s claims involve “vindication of a right under state law” that “necessarily turn[s]

on some construction of federal law,” Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers

Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9 (1983); whether the dismissal of Defendant’s co-defendants

impacts the Court’s jurisdiction; whether any CAFA exceptions set out in 28 U.S.C.

§ 1332 preclude the Court from exercising jurisdiction or whether there are reasons why

the CAFA exceptions do not apply; and any other issues relevant to the Court’s subject

matter jurisdiction. The parties should also pay attention and note for the Court which

party has the burden on any particular issue.

The parties shall simultaneously file motions or briefs within twenty-one (21) days

from today and shall include any evidence on which they intend to rely. The parties shall

then respond to each other’s filings within fourteen (14) days of the day of filing. Any

replies (which are optional) shall be due within seven days of the date of the response

brief.

The Court further ORDERS the parties to confer through counsel before filing any

motion or brief in response to this Order and to include certificates of conferences in their

initial briefs. If the parties assess the case and determine that the Court does not have

subject matter jurisdiction, the parties shall promptly file a notice in the Court so that the

Court may remand this action to the District Court of Oklahoma County for further

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of March 2024.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.