Opinion

Brown v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
May 19, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.4%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Seneca Brown )

) Case No.: 3:21-cv-199

)

Plaintiff,

) Judge Thomas M. Rose

)

v. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL:

) TERMINATION ENTRY

Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that this matter has

been settled, and counsel for the parties having provided approval to enter a

conditional dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with

prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause

shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Prior to the end of the timeframe to reopen this action, the parties may submit

a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated. Parties intending to

preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994) and incorporate

appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The undersigned also

requires that, if the parties intend to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction, then they

must submit to the Court a copy of the fully-executed settlement agreement (either

by filing it on the docket or emailing it to his chambers).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Thomas M. Rose_________________

Honorable Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.