Opinion

Mustaine v. Montgomery County Board of County Commissioners

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Apr 21, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.2%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

MITCHELL MUSTAINE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-504

vs.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY District Judge Michael J. Newman

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER (1) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT

OF COMMON PLEAS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 7); (2) DISMISSING

DEFENDANT MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FROM THIS

MATTER; AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT JUDGE RICHARD

SKELTON’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 11)

______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff initiated this civil case by filing a complaint, through counsel, raising employment

discrimination claims against three Defendants: the Montgomery County Board of Commissioner

(the “Board”), the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas (the “Common Pleas Court”),

and Judge Richard Skelton (collectively, “Defendants”). Doc. No. 1. In response, both the

Common Pleas Court and Judge Skelton filed motions to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). Doc.

Nos. 7, 11.

Rather than filing a memorandum in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss, Plaintiff

filed an amended complaint. Doc. No. 12. Amending a complaint in this situation, without leave

of Court, is permitted because Plaintiff filed his amended complaint within 21 days after

Defendants served their motions to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).

The Board and Judge Skelton each filed an answer to the amended complaint. Doc. Nos.

13, 14.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint omits claims against Common Pleas Court. Doc. No. 12.

Consequently, the Common Pleas Court is no longer a party to the case, and its motion to dismiss

(Doc. No. 7) is moot.

Additionally, the motions to dismiss filed by the Common Pleas Court and Judge Skelton

focus on Plaintiff’s original complaint. Plaintiff’s amended complaint “supersedes” his prior

complaint and “nulli[fies]” the motions to dismiss. See B & H Med., L.L.C. v. ABP Admin., Inc.,

526 F.3d 257, 267 n.8 (6th Cir. 2008) (quoting Drake v. City of Detroit, No. 06-1817, 2008 WL

482283, at *2 (6th Cir. Feb. 21, 2008)) (stating that a prior “complaint is a nullity, because an

amended complaint supersedes all prior complaints”). The Common Pleas Court and Judge

Skelton’s motions to dismiss are therefore moot.

For the foregoing reasons, the Common Pleas Court and Judge Skelton’s motions to

dismiss are DENIED AS MOOT. Doc. Nos. 7, 11. Judge Skelton may restate his arguments in

a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). The Court anticipates that Plaintiff,

Judge Skelton, and the Board will convene and submit a Rule 26(f) report in accordance with the

Court’s March 25, 2021 Order setting a preliminary pretrial conference. Doc. No. 15.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: April 21, 2021 s/Michael J. Newman

Hon. Michael J. Newman

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.