Opinion

Booker v. Board of Education of the Toledo City School District

Court
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Filed
May 13, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.1%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Stephanie Booker, Case No. 3:22-cv-1233

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Board of Education of Toledo

City School District,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Stephanie Booker has filed a motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the

appellate filing fee. (Doc. No. 21). She seeks to argue that I erred in dismissing her claims pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (See Doc. No. 16).

Section 1915 provides “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court

certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). A court may grant a

motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the issues are arguable on their merits, even if the petitioner

cannot show a probability of success on the merits. See, e.g., Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F. Supp. 2d 750,

765 (E.D. Mich. 2002). I conclude the issues Booker raises are not frivolous, even if she is unlikely

to succeed on appeal. Further, I conclude she has remedied the lack of clarity as to her financial

status in her original motion. (See Doc. Nos. 19 and 20). Therefore, I grant her motion to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. No. 21). I deny her first motion, (Doc. No. 19), as moot.

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.