Opinion

Brown v. Williams

Court
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Filed
May 6, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.0%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ELLIOT BROWN, ) CASE NO. 4:19CV2772

)

Petitioner, ) SENIOR JUDGE

) CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

vs. )

)

MARK WILLIAMS, Warden, ) MEMORANDUM OF

) OPINION AND ORDER

Respondent. )

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, S.J.:

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 12) to grant Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) Petitioner Elliot

Brown’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). Magistrate

Judge Greenberg also recommended denying as moot Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of

Counsel (Doc. 8). Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 20, 2021.

Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides that objections to a report and

recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2).

Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objection. Therefore, the Court must assume that

Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this

Court would be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) of the

Magistrate Judge; GRANTS Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10); DISMISSES Petitioner’s

Petition (Doc. 1); and DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.

8).

The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3). Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional

right directly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); FED. R. APP. P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christopher A. Boyko

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: May 6, 2021

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.