Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.

  • 315 U.S. 282
  • 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 415
  • 62 S. Ct. 608
  • 86 L. Ed. 848
  • 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1159
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Feb 16, 1942
Status
Published
On the bench
Jackson
Cited by
12 cases
Authority
More cited than 99.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.

Labor Board

v.

Link-Belt Co.,

311 U. S. 584 ;

Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

v.

Labor Board,

312 U. S. 660 . The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board’s order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in

Republic Steel Corp.

v.

Labor Board,

311 U. S.

*283

7. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.

Reversed.

Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.