Opinion

Brown v. CE Solutions Group, LLC

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Aug 15, 2023
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTEISST DRIISCTTR OICFT N CEOWU YROTR K

DARNELL BROWN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

23-CV-3029 (JGLC)

-against-

NOTICE OF

CE SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, et al., REASSIGNMENT

Defendants.

JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, United States District Judge:

This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. Unless and until the Court orders

otherwise, all prior orders, dates and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case’s

reassignment, except that any currently scheduled conference or oral argument before the Court is

adjourned pending further order of the Court. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the

Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, which are available at

https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jessica-g-l-clarke.

It is hereby ORDERED that no later than September 8, 2023, the parties shall file on

ECF a joint letter, described below, updating the Court on the status of the case. The joint letter

shall not exceed five pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs:

1. Names of counsel and current contact information, if different from the

information currently reflected on the docket;

2. A brief statement of the nature of the case and/or the principal defenses thereto,

and the major legal and factual issues that are most important to resolving the

case, whether by trial, settlement or dispositive motion;

3. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. In any action

in which subject matter jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1332, the letter must explain the basis for

the parties’ belief that diversity of citizenship exists. Where any party is a

corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation and the principal

place of business. In cases where any party is a partnership, limited partnership,

limited liability company, or trust, the letter shall state the citizenship of each of

the entity’s members, shareholders, partners, and/or trustees. See, e.g.,

Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2000). If this

information is lengthy, it may be included in an Appendix to the letter, not to be

included in the page limit;

4. A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates and/or cut-off dates;

5. A statement of any previously scheduled conference dates with the Court that

have not yet occurred and the matters that were to be discussed;

6. A brief description of any outstanding motions, including the date of the motion

and the nature of the relief sought;

7. A statement and description of any pending appeals;

8. A detailed statement of any discovery that has already taken place, including how

many depositions each party has taken and what, if any, discovery remains that is

necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations;

9. A brief description of the status of prior settlement discussions, without disclosing

exact offers and demands;

10. A statement of whether the parties have discussed the use of alternate dispute

resolution mechanisms and indicating whether the parties believe that (a) a

settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge; (b) participation in the District’s

Mediation Program; and/or (c) retention of a privately retained mediator would be

appropriate and, if so, when in the case (e.g., within the next sixty days; after the

deposition of plaintiff is completed; after the close of fact discovery; etc.) the use

of such a mechanism would be appropriate;

11. Anestimate of the length of trial; and

Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing

the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a description of any

dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.

If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel are not required to submit

such letter or to appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or

other proof of termination is filed on the docket prior to the deadline, using the appropriate ECF

Filing Event. See SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions §§ 13.17-13.19 & App’x A, available at

http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php.

In accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, requests for extensions or

adjournment may be made only by letter-motion filed on ECF and must be received at least 48

hours before the deadline or conference. The written submission must state (1) the original date

and the new date requested; (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension; (3)

whether these previous requests were granted or denied; (4) the reason for the extension or

adjournment; (5) whether the adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary

for refusal to consent; and (6) to the extent applicable, the date of the parties’ next scheduled

appearance before the Court. Unless counsel are notified that a conference has been adjourned, it

will be held as scheduled.

Dated: August 15, 2023

New York, New York

SO ORDERED.

{ >

C ance (Lar Ke

JESSICA G. L. CLARKE

5 United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.