Opinion

Brown v. New York City Department of Education

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
May 22, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.6%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------x

MARY HURD BROWN, :

:

Plaintiff, : 20-CV-2424 (VEC) (OTW)

:

-against-

: ORDER

:

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF

:

EDUCATION,

:

Defendant. :

:

--------------------------------------------------------------x

ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:

The Court is in receipt of ECF Nos. 87 and 88. Where a party appears pro se, the Court

must construe their pleadings broadly and interpret them to raise the strongest arguments that

they suggest. Graham v. Henderson, 89 F.3d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1996). The Court construes pro se

Plaintiff’s letter as a motion for expedited discovery of: (1) the documents contained in SED File

#26, 3654; (2) emails between Eric Friedman and Principal Gabbard discussing the denial of

Plaintiff’s car accommodation; and, (3) Plaintiff’s medical record. (ECF 87 at 1, 2). The parties

are directed to meet and confer on if Defendant can expedite the aforementioned documents.

The parties are further directed to file a joint status letter by June 2, 2023, to be filed on the

docket by counsel for Defendant.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se

Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang

Dated: May 22, 2023 Ona T. Wang

New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.