Opinion

Brown v. Un Deux Trois, Inc.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Mar 15, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.6%

The opinion

USDC SDNY

DOCUMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:

» 3/15/2023

LAMAR BROWN, on behalf of himself and all DATE BLED

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, 1:22-ev-8932-MKV

“against ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UN DEUX TROIS, INC.,

Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have

reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 13]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the

above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to

restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement

in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 1, 2023. If no such

application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc.

v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | . .

Date: March 15, 2023 MARY AY vyfcoc i

New York, NY United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.