Opinion

Brown v. John Civetta & Sons.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Feb 7, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.6%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MARY BROWN,

Plaintiff,

Vv. No. 22-CV-2609 (RA)

ORDER

JOHN CIVETTA & SONS and JOSHUA

MADRAY,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and

without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the

action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within

thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that

basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement,

the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court

within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir.

2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2023

New York, New York i

RonnieAbrams

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.