Opinion

Brown v. Skybound, LLC

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jan 19, 2023
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K

---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

:

LAMAR BROWN, :

:

Plaintiff, :

: 22 Civ. 8995 (JPC)

-v- :

: ORDER

SKYBOUND, LLC, :

:

:

Defendant. :

:

---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge:

The Complaint in this action was filed on October 21, 2022. Dkt. 1. Defendant has not

appeared in this action, and the docket does not reflect whether Defendant has been served.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days

after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must

dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a

specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Nor has Plaintiff requested an extension of time to serve

Defendant.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status letter by January 20, 2023 at 8:00 p.m.,

describing (1) whether service of the summons and Complaint has been made on Defendant, and if

not, (2) why good cause exists to excuse Plaintiff’s failure to serve Defendant within the 90-day

deadline set by Rule 4(m). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“[I]f the plaintiff shows good cause for the

failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.”). The Court reminds

Plaintiff that “[t]o establish good case a plaintiff must demonstrate that despite diligent attempts,

service could not be made due to exceptional circumstances beyond his or her control.” Deptula v.

Rosen, 558 F. Supp. 3d 73, 75 (S.D.N.Y. 2021) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Plaintiff must file this letter even if service of the summons and Complaint is or has already

been made on Defendant. If Defendant has been served, Plaintiff must also file proof of service on

the docket no later than January 20, 2023. If no such letter is filed, the Court may dismiss the case

for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED. VfB

Dated: January 19, 2023 °

New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.