The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE: GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: The sealing application is provisional
approved.
AIM Media Ind. Operating, LLC v. Google, LLC, SO ORDERED.
No. 1:21-cv-06912-PKC (S.D.N.Y.) 10/24/22
AIM Media Midwest Operating, LLC v. Google,
LLC, No. 1:21-cv-06884-PKC (S.D.N.Y.) ZO Reon lps □ x
AIM Media Tex. Operating, LLC v. Google, LLC, P. Kevin Castel
No. 1:21-cv-06888-PKC (S.D.N.Y.) United States District Judge
Brown Cnty. Publ’g Co., Inc. v. Google, LLC, No.
1:21-cv-06915-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Capital Region Indep. Media LLC vy. Google LLC,
No. 1:22-cv-06997-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Clarksburg Publ’g Co., d/b/a WV News v. Google, 21-md-3010
LLC, No. 1:21-cv-06840-PKC (S.D.N.Y.) Case No. KMKOCMIRKM (PKC)
Coastal Point LLC v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21- cv-
06824-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Eagle Printing Co. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21- ev-
06881-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
ECENT Corp. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21-cv- 06817-
PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Google, LLC, No.
1:21-cv-06794-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Flag Publ’ns, Inc. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-
06871-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Gale Force Media, LLC v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21-
cv-06909-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Gould Enters., Inc. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-
01705-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
HD Media Co., LLC v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-
06796-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Journal Inc. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-06828-
PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Neighborhood Newspapers, Inc. v. Google LLC,
No. 1:21-cv-10188-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Robinson Commc’ns, Inc. v. Google, LLC, No.
1:21-cv-08032-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Rome News Media, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 1:21-
cv-10186-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Savannah Publ’g Co. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:22-
cv-01693-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Something Extra Publ’g, Inc. v. Google, LLC, No.
1:21-cv-09523-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Southern Cmty. Newspapers, Inc. v. Google, LLC,
No. 1:22-cv-01971-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Times Journal, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 1:21-cv-
10187-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Union City Daily Messenger, Inc. v. Google, LLC,
No. 1:22-cv-01704-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
Weakley Cnty. Press, Inc. v. Google, LLC, No. 1:22-
cv-01701-PKC (S.D.N.Y.)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NEWSPAPER PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO SEAL
The Court, having reviewed the relevant submissions and determined that
the information sought to be redacted by Meta Platforms, Inc. is competitively sensitive
and the interests in preventing competitive harm outweigh any applicable presumption of
access, see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006),
hereby:
ORDERS that the Newspaper Plaintiffs file a public version of their
proposed Amended Complaint that redacts information highlighted in Exhibit A to Meta
Platform, Inc.’s Response in Support of the Newspaper Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal, and
that the unredacted proposed Amended Complaint be filed under seal.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
HONORABLE P. KEVIN CASTEL
United States District Judge