Opinion

In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Oct 24, 2022
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

nnn ee X

: 13 Civ. 7789 (LGS)

IN RE FOREIGN EXCHANGE BENCHMARK :

RATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION. : ORDER FOR

: JUDGMENT

nnn ee X

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:

WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, a jury trial commenced on the two issues with respect

to which class certification was granted;

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2022, the jury returned a special verdict finding that

Plaintiffs did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendants Credit Suisse AG,

Credit Suisse Group AG and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (the “Credit Suisse

Defendants”) knowingly participated in a conspiracy to widen, fix, stabilize or maintain bid-ask

spreads in the foreign exchange market;

WHEREAS, knowing participation in a conspiracy is an element of Plaintiffs’ remaining

claims under Section | of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (“Section 1”). See United States v.

Aiver, 33 F.4th 97, 122 (2d Cir. 2022) (noting that whether the defendant “knowingly joined a

conspiracy to fix prices” was one of the “essential elements” of a Section 1 violation).

It is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of the Credit Suisse Defendants and against Plaintiffs on

the Section 1 claims in the Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.

2. This Court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this Judgment.

Dated: October 24, 2022

New York, New York □

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.