Opinion

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Mar 1, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.4%

upholding trial court's decision to “safeguard . . . confidential material” by placing documents under seal

How later courts described this case

  • upholding trial court's decision to “safeguard . . . confidential material” by placing documents under seal

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COVINGTON Robert D. Wick

BEIJING BRUSSELS DUBAI FRANKFURT JOHANNESBURG Covington & Burling LLP

LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO One CityCenter

SAN FRANCISCO SEOUL SHANGHAI WASHINGTON 850 Tenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001-4956

T +1202 662 5487

rwick@cov.com

Via ECF February 28, 2022

The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla

United States District Court, Southern District of New York MEMO ENDORSE!

40 Foley Square

New York, NY 10007

Re: Jowa Public Employees’ Retirement System v. Bank of America Corp.,

No. 17-cev-6221-KPF (S.D.N.Y.)

Dear Judge Failla:

Pursuant to Paragraph 9(B) of Your Honor’s individual rules, JPMorgan respectfully

requests permission to file under seal and in redacted form certain exhibits to its opposition to

Plaintiffs’ letter-motion for leave to serve certain “spoliation-related” interrogatories (ECF No.

527).

JPMorgan proposes to file under seal the parties’ Phone Agreement, which was

negotiated among all parties in this action and designated “highly confidential” pursuant to the

parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 150), and therefore must be filed under seal in

accordance with Section 9 of that order. JPMorgan also proposes to redact the names of certain

custodians and deponents in this action in one of its exhibits. The Second Circuit has recognized

the appropriateness of sealing confidential information. See, e.g., DiRussa v. Dean Witter

Reynolds, Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 826 (2d Cir. 1997) (upholding trial court's decision to “safeguard . .

. confidential material” by placing documents under seal). Pursuant to Your Honor’s individual

rules and this Court’s Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, we are contemporaneously

filing sealed versions of these three exhibits, with JPMorgan’s proposed redactions highlighted.

Respectfully submitted,

Ls/

Robert D. Wick

Counsel for the JPMorgan Defendants

may file an unredacted version of this submission under seal, viewable

only to the parties and the Court.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket

entry 530.

Dated: March 1, 2022

New York, New York

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.