Opinion

Brown v. Campbell

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jan 19, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CAROL BROWN,

Plaintiff,

22-CV-0362 (LTS)

-against-

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CRYSTAL CAMPBELL,

Defendant.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action, alleging that Defendant violated her

rights. The Court dismisses the complaint for the following reasons.

Plaintiff has previously submitted to this Court a substantially similar complaint against

Defendant alleging the same set of facts. That case is presently pending before this Court under

docket number ECF 1:21-CV-10276 (LTS). As this complaint raises the same claims, no useful

purpose would be served by litigating this duplicate lawsuit. Therefore, this complaint is

dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s pending case under docket number 1:21-CV-10276

(LTS).

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of Plaintiff’s pending

case under docket number 1:21-CV-10276 (LTS).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order

would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose

of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on

the docket.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2022

New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

Chief United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.