Opinion

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Oct 20, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.4%

upholding trial court's decision to “safeguard . . . confidential material” by placing documents under seal

How later courts described this case

  • upholding trial court's decision to “safeguard . . . confidential material” by placing documents under seal

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COVINGTON Robert D. Wick

BEIJING BRUSSELS DUBAI FRANKFURT JOHANNESBURG Covington & Burling LLP

LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO One CityCenter

SAN FRANCISCO SEOUL SHANGHAI WASHINGTON 850 Tenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001-4956

T +1202 6625487

rwick@cov.com

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave October 19, 2021

Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, Room 1670

New York, NY 10007

RE: Jowa Pub. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. et al. v. Bank of Am. Corp. et al.,

No. 17-cv-6221 (KPF/SLC)

Dear Magistrate Judge Cave:

As counsel to the JPMorgan Defendants in the above-captioned action, I write on behalf

of all Defendants to request permission to redact references to confidential material in

Defendants’ letter-motion requesting leave to file a sur-reply brief in opposition to Plaintiffs’

motion for class certification. The material Defendants propose to redact and file under seal

consists solely of references to expert materials that (1) have already been filed under seal

pursuant to sealing orders issued by Judge Failla and (11) were designated “Highly Confidential”

by Plaintiffs pursuant to the protective order issued by Judge Failla. The Second Circuit has

recognized the appropriateness of sealing confidential information. See, e.g., DiRussa v. Dean

Witter Reynolds Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 826 (2d Cir. 1997) (upholding trial court's decision to

“safeguard . . . confidential material” by placing documents under seal).

Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Practices and this Court’s Electronic Case Filing

Rules & Instructions, we are contemporaneously filing a sealed version of Defendants’ letter-

motion requesting leave to submit a sur-reply, with Defendants’ proposed redactions highlighted.

Defendants’ letter-motion to seal (ECF No. 472)

Respectfully submitted,

the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to /s/ Robert D. Wick

access to ECF No. 473 (the "Letter-Motion") to Court

and the case participants. Robert D. Wick

Defendants shall publicly file their Letter- Counsel for the JPMorgan Defendants

imposing the proposed redactions that appear in writing on behalf of all Defendants

473.

of Court is also respectfully directed to close ECF

10/20/2021 a AA

( Lif

AN Wy Af / _

{ SARAH L. A

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.