Opinion

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Aug 4, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.3%

The opinion

ENDORSED CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP

WORLDWIDE PLAZA

HN W. WHITE GEORGE E. ZOBITZ DAVID J. PERKINS EVAN MEHRAN NORRIS

R. CHESLER GEORGE A. STEPHANAKIS 825 EIGHTH Av ENUE J. LEONARD TETI, II LAUREN M, ROSENBER

L. GORDON DARIN P. MCATEE D. SCOTT BENNETT MICHAEL L. ARNOLD

BERT H. BARON GARY A. BORNSTEIN New Yo RK, NY 1OOIS9 -7475 TING S. CHEN HEATHER A. BENJAMIN

VID MERCADO TIMOTHY G. CAMERON CHRISTOPHER K. FARGO MATTHEW J. BOBBY

RISTINE A. VARNEY KARIN A. DEMASI TELEPHONE: +1-212-474-!1000 DAVID M. STUART DANIEL J. CERQUEIRA

T. BARBUR DAVID S. FINKELSTEIN AARON M. GRUBER ALEXANDRA C. DENNIN

S, GOLDMAN RACHEL G. SKAISTIS FACSIMILE: +1-212-474-3700 ©. KEITH HALLAM, III HELAM GEBREMARIAM

HALL PAUL H. ZUMBRO OMID H. NASAB MATTHEW G. JONES

LIE A, NORTH ERIC W. HILFERS DAMARIS HERNANDEZ MATTHEW M., KELLY

DREW W. NEEDHAM GEORGE F. SCHOEN CITYPOINT JONATHAN J. KATZ DAVID H. KORN

L. BURNS ERIK R. TAVZEL ONE ROPEMAKER STREET DAVID L. PORTILLA BRITTANY L. □□□□□□□□□□

B. FORREST CRAIG F. ARCELLA LONDON EC2Y 9HR RORY A. LERARIS ANDREW M. WARK

R. HUMMEL DAMIEN R. ZOUBEK TELEPHONE: +44-20-7453-1000 KARA L. MUNGOVAN

VID J. KAPPOS LAUREN ANGELILLI FACSIMILE: +44-20-7860-1150 MARGARET T. SEGALL

NIEL SLIFKIN TATIANA LAPUSHCHIK NICHOLAS A. DORSEY

I. TOWNSEND, III ALYSSA K. CAPLES ANDREW C. ELKEN PARTNER EMERITUS

ILIP J. BOECKMAN JENNIFER S. CONWAY JENNY HOCHENBERG SAMUEDC: BUTTER

V. FOGG MINH VAN NGO : VANESSA A, LAVELY Sa

J. SAEED KEVIN J. ORSINI WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER G.J. LIGELIS JR.

J. STARK MATTHEW MORREALE +1-212-474-1760 MICHAEL E. MARIANI OF COUNSEL

OMAS E. DUNN JOHN D. BURETTA LAUREN R. KENNEDY MICHAEL L. SCHLER

|. GREENE J. WESLEY EARNHARDT > SASHA ROSENTHAL-LARREA CHRISTOPHER J. KELL’

VID R. MARRIOTT YONATAN EVEN WRITER S EMAIL ADDRESS ALLISON M, WEIN KIMBERLEY S. DREXLEF

A. PASKIN BENJAMIN GRUENSTEIN MPaskin @ cravath.com MICHAEL P. ADDIS NICOLE F. FOSTER

DREW J. PITTS JOSEPH D. ZAVAGLIA JUSTIN C. CLARKE LILLIAN S. GROSSBARC

T. REYNOLDS STEPHEN M. KESSING SHARONMOYEE GOSWAMI KIMBERLY A. GROUSSE

TONY L. RYAN LAUREN A. MOSKOWITZ Cc. DANIEL HAAREN ANDREI HARASYMIAK

August 3, 2021

Towa Pub. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. et al. v. Bank of Am. Corp. et al., No. 17-cv-6221 (KPF)

Dear Judge Failla:

Section 9 of the Protective Order (Dkt. Nos. 150, 228) provides that for any filing

that quotes or refers to discovery material that has been designated Confidential, Highly

Confidential, or Highly Confidential Data, the party “shall request to file such documents

or portions thereof containing or making reference to such material or information in

redacted form or under seal.” Consistent with the process this Court approved for such

requests (Dkt. No. 408), the Parties now move for sealing or redaction of certain materials

filed with Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Motion. The Parties’

justifications for sealing or redacting those materials under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of

Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006), and its progeny are as follows.

Defendants’ Justifications and Designations

Defendants’ memorandum and certain supporting materials quote from, discuss,

and make reference to the substance of documents and data designated “Confidential” and

“Highly Confidential” under the Parties’ January 2, 2019 Protective Order (Dkt. No. 150),

and “Highly Confidential Data” under the Parties’ October 30, 2019 Supplemental

Protective Order (Dkt No. 228). Such materials include trade secrets, other confidential

research, development, or commercial information, and other private or competitively

sensitive information, including personal data. Accordingly, Defendants request that the

marked portions of Defendants’ memorandum of law, of Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 67, and 68 to

the Declaration of Michael A. Paskin dated June 29, 2021 (the “Paskin Declaration’), and

the Paskin Declaration itself, be filed in redacted form. We also ask that Exhibits 5, 10,

16, 29-30, 32-35, 38-39, 43-46, 55-58, 60, and 62-65 to the Paskin Declaration be filed

entirely under seal. This is in accordance with Section 9 of the Protective Order, which

provides that for “papers containing or making reference to the substance of

“Confidential”, “Highly Confidential”, or “Highly Confidential Data’] material or

information, [a Party] shall request to file such documents or portions thereof containing

or making reference to such material or information in redacted form or under seal.”

Defendants’ memorandum and certain supporting materials also quote from,

discuss, and refer to the substance of discovery material produced by Third Parties subject

to confidentiality designations, which likewise include trade secrets, other confidential

research, development, or commercial information, or other private or competitively

sensitive information, including personal data. Defendants have proposed, and Plaintiffs

have had the opportunity to review, filing such materials under seal or with redactions

consistent with the designations made by Third Parties and Lugosch. Accordingly,

Defendants request on their behalf that marked portions of Defendants’ memorandum and

Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the Paskin Declaration, and the Paskin Declaration itself, be filed

in redacted form. We also request that Exhibits 6-8, 11-15, 17-28, 31, 36-37, 40-41, 47-54,

and 61 to the Paskin Declaration be filed entirely under seal.

Plaintiffs’ Justifications and Designations

Defendants’ opposition papers quote from, discuss, and refer to discovery material

produced by certain Parties subject to confidentiality designations, which include trade

secrets, highly confidential data, other confidential research, development, or commercial

information, or other private or competitively sensitive information, including personal

data. In addition, Defendants’ papers discuss in detail material approved for redaction or

sealing pursuant to ECF 422. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request that the marked portions of

Defendants’ memorandum of law, of Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the Declaration of Michael

A. Paskin dated June 29, 2021, and Mr. Paskin’s Declaration itself, be filed in redacted

form. We also ask that Exhibits 9, 42, 59, and 66 to Mr. Paskin’s Declaration be filed under

seal. Plaintiffs take no position with respect to Defendants’ redaction and under-seal

requests beyond those which we request ourselves, and reserve all rights under the

Protective Orders.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael A. Paskin

Michael A. Paskin

Attorney for Defendants Morgan Stanley &

Co. LLC, Prime Dealer Services Corp., and

Strategic Investments I, Inc.

Honorable Katherine Polk Failla

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

40 Foley Square, Room 2103

New York, NY 10007

VIA ECF AND EMAIL

Application GRANTED. The portions of Defendants' submissions

specified above may be filed under seal, viewable only to the

parties and the Court.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at

docket entry 440.

Date: August 4, 2021 SO ORDERED.

New York, New York

Kathir Palle (flo

HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.