“[T]he decision as to access is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial court, a discretion to be exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case.””
How later courts described this case
- “[T]he decision as to access is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial court, a discretion to be exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case.””
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
US AIRWAYS, INC., :
Plaintiff, :
: 11 Civ. 2725 (LGS)
-against- :
: ORDER
SABRE HOLDINGS CORP., et al., :
Defendants. :
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, by letter emailed to the Chambers inbox, dated January 28, 2021, Plaintiff requested
leave to amend its Fourth Amended Complaint and permission to file under seal portions of the Fifth
Amended Complaint (‘FAC’). The letter is attached hereto. It is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’ request for leave to amend its Complaint and to seal portions of the
FAC is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file by February 2, 2021: (1) a redacted version of the FAC, consistent
with the proposed highlighted redactions, on the docket and (2) an unredacted version of the FAC under
seal. Although “[t]he common law right of public access to judicial documents is firmly rooted in our
nation’s history,” this right is not absolute, and courts “must balance competing considerations against” the
presumption of access. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006)
(internal quotation marks omitted); see also Nixon v. WarnerCommce’ns., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)
(“[T]he decision as to access is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial court, a discretion to be
exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case.””). The proposed redactions
are narrowly tailored to prevent unauthorized dissemination of sensitive business information. The parties
are advised that the Court retains discretion whether to afford confidential treatment to sealed material in
any Court order or proceeding and that per Individual Rule I.D.3. letter motions to seal documents shall be
publicly filed on the ECF.
Dated: January 29, 2021
New York, New York LORNA G. SCHOFIEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
O'Melveny
O'Melveny & Myers LLP T: +1 212 326 2000
Times Square Tower F: +1 212 326 2061
7 Times Square omm.com
New York, NY 10036-6537
Andrew J. Frackman
D: +1 212 326 2017
afrackman@omm.com
January 28, 2021
VIA ECF
Hon. Lorna G. Schofield
United States District Court
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in
Interest v. Sabre Holdings Corp., et al., No. 1:11-cv-02725-LGS
Request for Leave to Amend
Dear Judge Schofield:
Per the Court’s January 14, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 986), to streamline the case, US
Airways attaches its proposed Fifth Amended Complaint that removes the prior request for
equitable relief. We have also eliminated the few factual allegations that were included to
provide a factual predicate for forward-looking relief. Attached is a redline showing the
proposed changes. Given that these changes are minor (they are limited to removing the
request for equitable relief and no new claims have been added), we respectfully ask that the
Court grant leave on the basis of this request. The parties met and conferred and Sabre does
not oppose US Airways’ request to amend because US Airways is not, and will not be, seeking
to reinstate US Airways’ request for injunctive relief in this action, Case 1:11-cv-02725-LGS.
Additionally, in accordance with Your Honor’s Individual Rule of Practice 1.C.3., US
Airways respectfully requests that the Court permit redactions of the yellow-highlighted portions
of US Airways’ proposed Fifth Amended Complaint. US Airways’ request is limited to redactions
that were previously approved by the Court. Dkt. No. 950 (granting US Airways’ request to seal
portions of its Fourth Amended Complaint).
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew J. Frackman
of O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
for US Airways, Inc. for American Airlines, Inc. as
Successor and Real Party in Interest
CC: Counsel for Sabre (via e-mail)