Opinion

Beresnyak v. Catholic Medical Mission Board, Inc.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jun 1, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.1%

holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue

How later courts described this case

  • holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

TIMOTHY A. BERESNYAK,

Plaintiff,

20-CV-4083 (CM)

-against-

ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES

CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD,

OR IFP APPLICATION

INC.; BRUCE WILKINSON; MESERET

ANSEBO; JOHN MIX,

Defendants.

COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge:

Plaintiff Timothy A. Beresnyak brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in

this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00

administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is,

without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Plaintiff submitted the complaint without the filing fees or an IFP application. Within

thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit the

attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket

number 20-CV-4083 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to

proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on

the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case

shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to

comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would

not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf.

Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates

good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2020

New York, New York hie l

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.