Opinion

Brown v. Whitley

Court
District Court, E.D. New York
Filed
May 12, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------- X

:

LORRAINE BROWN,

:

Plaintiff,

: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

– against – : 21-CV-2933 (AMD) (CLP)

:

JOHN E. WHITLEY, Acting Secretary of the

Army, and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, :

:

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------- X

ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge :

On May 24, 2021, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, alleging

racial and national origin discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation and wrongful

termination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Righ ts Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 200e et seq.

(ECF No. 1.) On January 14, 2022, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) On

February 21, 2022, the plaintiff submitted a letter motion seeking leave to file a second amended

complaint to add a new plaintiff. (ECF No. 19.)

On April 22, 2022, Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak issued a characteristically

thoughtful Report and Recommendation, in which she recommends that the plaintiff’s motion be

denied without prejudice to the plaintiff filing a formal motion to amend, including an amended

complaint and memorandum of law in accordance with the Local Rules of this District. She

further recommends that the defendants’ time to answer, move or otherwise respond be stayed

until any motion to amend is resolved. (See ECF No. 22.) No objections to the Report and

Recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those

portions of a report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been made, “a district

court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Jarvis v. N.

Am. Globex Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting Wilds v. United

Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)).

Judge Pollak’s well-reasoned and comprehensive Report and Recommendation contains

no error. Accordingly, I adopt it in its entirety. If the plaintiff wishes to file a formal motion to

amend, she must do so by June 11, 2022.

SO ORDERED.

s/Ann M. Donnelly

___________________________

ANN M. DONNELLY

United States District Judge

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

May 12, 2022

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.