Opinion

Holloman v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 24, 2009
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6510

LENNELL HOLLOMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JUDGE BROWN, Judge,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 24, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lennell Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Holloman appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v.

Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009;

entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.